View Single Post

   
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2008, 10:32 AM
Paul Lautman
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Is a table with 100 fields too big?

firewoodtim@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:18:16 +0100, "Rik Wasmus"
> <luiheidsgoeroe@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> "snip"
>>
>>Eehm. Why does it deliver unnecessary data? You control the queries,
>>how come the queries don't ask for just the data they need?
>>

>
> Well, I read somewhere that 'SELECT *' was a lot faster than naming a
> bunch of fields that are specific for the exact task for the moment.


Wherever it was you read that, make sure you don't go there again!


Reply With Quote