Re: suspicious pointer/integer coersion > Looking further ... we already do this implicitly for prodesc in the
> call handler - we would just need to do the same thing for per-call
> structures and divorce them from prodesc, which can be repeated on the
> implicit stack.
>
> I'll work on that - changes should be quite small.
Sounds like recursive calls are somethign that should be tested for PLs
in the regressions...
Chris
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |