* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Yeah, let's take a look. This wouldn't be the first part of the spec
> we've come across that is mostly honored in the breach...

Oracle appears to mostly follow it, except there's an implicit
'SET ROLE all;', at least in the instance I'm looking at. I'm guessing
it's probably something which is tunable. We don't currently have a way
of having certain roles turned on and certain ones turned off for a
given session. That doesn't seem like it'd be a very hard thing to add
though. I have to apologize for not realizing this sooner and
implementing it correctly the first time, sorry about that..

Thanks,

Stephen

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC4BXCrzgMPqB3kigRAiR6AJ9dkGNnO5IP8HG2jGnGJL 3a1Wi+swCfQsNu
Qq3oGqNE1xd95xAgJ1nyBbs=
=JtJ+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----