Tom Lane wrote:
> The proposed patch to Makefile.shlib makes me gag :-( ...

It is ugly.

> lying to make
> about what's the purpose of a rule is seldom a good idea. Please try
> as attached instead.

I will ASAP.

> Also, I am *really* dubious about the change to
> ecpg/test/Makefile.regress --- if that's necessary then this whole
> exercise is wrong.

For a dynamic build you do not need the change.
Only a --disable-shared build will gag without it. I'll have a look
at that too.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster