On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:17:30 -0000
"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com> wrote:

> I don't think it's fair to simply discard the use cases provided as
> "implausible" and demand one more to your liking. I strongly dislike
> having a giant dump file written that has non-vital configuration
> variables embedded in the top of it, precluding any user choice
> whatsoever[1]. As before, where are the reports of all the people
> having their manual restorations interrupted by a statement_timeout?

Calling me, wondering why in the world it is happening.

Joshua D. Drake

--
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers