View Single Post

   
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:56 AM
Jonah H. Harris
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Thousands of tables versus on table?

On 6/6/07, Craig James <craig_james@emolecules.com> wrote:
> They're blowing smoke if they think Oracle can do this.


Oracle could handle this fine.

> Oracle fell over dead, even with the best indexing possible,
> tuned by the experts, and using partitions keyed to the
> customerID.


I don't think so, whoever tuned this likely didn't know what they were doing.

> It's telling that Oracle's license contract prohibits you from
> publishing comparisons and benchmarks. You have to wonder why.


They did this for the same reason as everyone else. They don't want
non-experts tuning the database incorrectly, writing a benchmark paper
about it, and making the software look bad.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply With Quote