joel garry wrote:
> On May 8, 1:40 pm, Ivan Marsh <ivanma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 08 May 2008 13:34:30 -0700, joel garry wrote:
>>> On May 8, 10:07 am, chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>>> joel garry wrote:
>>>>> I've come to the opinion that linux as sold/supported is a toy OS
>>>>> running on toy hardware,
>>
>>>> Yeah, that's why countless corporations and research organizations
>>>> use and depend on it. Tell google that Linux is a "toy OS".
>>
>>>> Idiot.
>>
>>> A decade ago I was very pro-linux in cola.).
>>
>> That explains more than anyone ever need know.
>>
>
> :-)
>
> But still, I'm not the only one who was excited about it and then
> disillusioned as it bloated, I'm not the only one who thinks Intel
> hardware sucks, and I'm not the only one who thinks there should be a
> fork specifically for db needs. Do you not think these are legitimate
> advocacy issues?
>

No one is forcing you to use Intel hardware to run Linux ...

--
Jeroen