On May 8, 1:40*pm, Ivan Marsh <ivanma...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 13:34:30 -0700, joel garry wrote:
> > On May 8, 10:07*am, chrisv <chr...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> >> joel garry wrote:
> >> >I've come to the opinion that linux as sold/supported is a toy OS
> >> >running on toy hardware,
>
> >> Yeah, that's why countless corporations and research organizations use
> >> and depend on it. *Tell google that Linux is a "toy OS".
>
> >> Idiot.
>
> > A decade ago I was very pro-linux in cola.).
>
> That explains more than anyone ever need know.
>

:-)

But still, I'm not the only one who was excited about it and then
disillusioned as it bloated, I'm not the only one who thinks Intel
hardware sucks, and I'm not the only one who thinks there should be a
fork specifically for db needs. Do you not think these are legitimate
advocacy issues?

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
http://blogs.zdnet.com/virtualization/?p=413