On Tue, 27 May 2008, »Q« wrote:

> Linux bellgrove 2.6.24-tuxonice-r4-smp #10 SMP Sun Apr 20 [snip]
> 111 222
>
> 1 - doesn't matter, could be anything, as Dan has said
> 2 - indicates that my running kernel actually is smp-enabled
>
> The first one is the result of setting CONFIG_LOCALVERSION -- Patrick
> sets this to "SMP" or something similar for his smp kernels. I'd think
> it's a good idea to change it for kernels you compile yourself.
>
> The second one is the one that depends an CONFIG_SMP=y.

This is how I understood it. I do not think "uname -a" has
ever mis-reported on my system. WYSIWYG!

Dominic