Hi,

tunla wrote:
> RXMiller@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>Thanks Lars, so from a processing performance standpoint, how would you
>>rate the V440, x4200 and T2000? Would I get better performance by
>>upgrading my current server or purchasing a new one?
>>
>>I'm trying to find some performance matrix out there but with the
>>different chips it makes it hard to compare apples to apples.
>>
>
>
> What can be said is that the T2000 will be slower if you measure
>
> a single transaction. But will handle a lot more transactions
> concurrently.
> the T2000 has "hardware context swithching" for 32 processes,
> whilst
> the X4200 and V440 only handles 4 prcoesses at a time.
Off topic

Since I assume that you are a Swede to you should know that we did
"hardware context swithching" for 40 years ago, I would guess that we
actually invented it and it did util recently(few month ago) control all
Civil Aviation in Sweden

And the OS run was OS-2! which was made by ENEA now doing OSE which is
in many many mobiles and all /// systems.

Today "hardware context swithching" is done by moving the OS scheduler
into hardware, thats fast!

The name of these super "first of its kind"? Realtime CPUs was Censor
9103,9107,9109(still in full operation in Civil Aviation in countries)
made by DATASAAB and later /// SAABTECH Sweden.

/michael