 Re: Suse 9,2 Linux is a real dog.
roy wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 16:41:58 -0800, Joe Cipale wrote:
>
>
>>7 wrote:
>>
>>>Amarnaut Chedda wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 23:56:42 +0000, 7 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Amarnaut Chedda wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Why is Suse 9.s so slow compared to Mandrake 10.1? I migrated from
>>>>>>Mandrake to Suse because I had heard good things about it but my
>>>>>>experience is the oppposite, suse is very slow and seems to be
>>>>>>riddled with bugs.
>>>>>>I am greatful for one thing and that is I didn't pay anything for
>>>>>>this garbage.
>>>>>>Suse should forget about trying to be everything to everyone and at
>>>>>>least release a version of Linux that works. Back to Mandrake for
>>>>>>me.
>>>>>>Chedda
>>>>>
>>>>>Dear flat fish,
>>>>>Try pre-linking for speed.
>>>>>The problem is that you need to be replaced by a trained techie.
>>>>>Please resign and let management choose better staff to replace you.
>>>>
>>>>I am not understanding you. How does your answer explain why Mandrake
>>>>is so much faster than Suse. I did not do a thing to Mandrake, or Suse
>>>>for that matter. What is a flatfish?
>>>
>>>Signorita, flat fish is a fishy meal served flat side up with tartar
>>>sauce.
>>>
>>>Yum yum.
>>>
>>>No I can't supply you with information about Mandrake v. Suse unless you
>>>post some test results like how long it took to copy a 100Mb file for
>>>instance.
>>
>>If you want to execute performance tests, execute bonnie++ a couple of
>>times on each distro. That will give you an idea of performanace:
>>perceived vs. real.
>
>
> Perception is everything.
But everything is nothing.
 |