View Single Post

   
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 11:31 AM
An Metet
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 192.168.0.x Hackable?!

NOTE: This message was sent thru a mail2news gateway.
No effort was made to verify the identity of the sender.
--------------------------------------------------------

pgp trash troll delete

Alan Hicks <alan@lizella.network> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1


> In alt.os.linux.slackware, B'ichela dared to utter,
> > Its a private Class C address. As long as your ISPs router(s)
> > are configured right then no one outside of your ISP would be able to
> > connect in.


> Don't listen to this guy, he obviously doesn't know how ethernet works.
> Just because an ISP filters spoofed packets doesn't mean a few won't
> get through. It also doesn't mean that some one has to try to route to
> 192.168.0.x. They can simply talk to your NAT router's external IP,
> probe around a bit, and see what comes back. From that, they can
> potentially access your inside network.


> > Because this box IS the router all of my machines behind it can't be
> > accessed directly.


> Perhaps, perhaps not. They can however, most certainly be accessed
> indirectly.


> > You also should look at IPMasquarading as well as IPchains as
> > well.


> Good God! Don't listen to this guy! IPchains is so 2.2.x.
> Netfilter/IPtables is the current firewall implimentation for linux.


> - --
> It is better to hear the rebuke of the wise,
> Than for a man to hear the song of fools.
> Ecclesiastes 7:5
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)


> iD8DBQFApL7mL3KiNGOqr6ERAvwfAJ9GNiyda29aStfBGYTC7V DPz2X1AgCglei1
> pWh0UqqZuoch4x2r3GgT/bU=
> =Po0E
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
















Reply With Quote