View Single Post

   
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-19-2008, 09:22 PM
The Eighth Doctor
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Kernel question about quotas

In article <10vbi2jhp9050f5@corp.supernews.com>, csoren@isd.net says...
>
>The Eighth Doctor wrote:
>> Hello from the Eighth Doctor
>> Since my normal developer's box that runs Slackware 10.0, will also be visited

by
>> customers, via SSH, I decided to add quotas. I did the one for the first user, and
>> then for root.
>>
>> Rebooted, and during the process the system installed the qouta module. It
>> complained insisting that the module's installation would compromise the kernel,

it
>> would "taint it", it stated. After the sequence had completed, and it created the

quota
>> settings for the root user, I checked the list of modules.
>>
>> Under "tainted", there was a blank in the line for the quota module. Now this is

the
>> same module that was built along with everything else the last time I built a new
>> kernel for the system. Last night in fact.
>>
>> To create the quotas, I followed the instructions included in the rc.M file. I can't

see
>> why the kernel module loader would complain, especially since the module

source
>> code came from the same code base, that the kernel source code itself contains.
>> Basically I am confused.
>>
>> Also I did look at the entries discussing the problem of "tainting", with regards

to
>> modules and the GPL the first time it came up and made a nuisance of itself. It

made
>> no mention of my problem then, which happened to be the same as before.
>> -------
>> Gregg drwho8 atsign att dot net
>>

>
>You don't have to worry, the taint nag is 'political engineering' not
>software engineering...

Hello from the Eighth Doctor
Oh.
I'd like to send the <Expletive deleted!> to Kessel, or Hoth, for allowing that to
happen. Oh I'm not worried, but it is annoying.
--
Gregg drwho8 atsign att dot net

Reply With Quote