Re: Slackware Update On 2005-05-08, Franklin <Franklin@tower.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 08 May 2005 18:26:15 +0000, Al. C wrote:
>
> Yes I'm rude.
> So what.
>
> By the way, any reason you didn't quote this:
>
>>If you were talking about a distro like Suse, which does not allow for
>>the upgrade of individual package versions without buying the next
>>release of the distro, your pointless rant would have some merit.
>>However, since I can run -current with little effort and no expense
>>(unless I choose) and the 10.1 release is free as in beer for anyone who
>>wants it, you're just pissing into the wind, as usual.
>
> Oh that's right, you don't know how to respond when someone points out
> that your logic is flawed. You just leave out what you can't deal with.
>
ac engages in philisophical arguments, knowing full well, there is no right or
wrong answers, just debatable positions. This is the sum total of his Linux
expertise.
He's a computer expert, yet he's been through three distos in as many years.
He was advised NOT to use slackware, yet he took the leap and now he
complains.
ac is a just another peddler of philisophical positions for which there are
no real answers. It's safe and self validating...no one can be right and no
one can be wrong. It's the perfect middle ground for ac, it's where he's
comfortable and safe.
ken |