Re: Slackware Update Trygve Selmer wrote:
> You know, I know, and the rest of the group knows that discussing
> Slackware's business model and other aspects of how Slackware as a
> company is run in this NG is a waste of time. This discussion can only
> be held with mister Volkerding,
Uh, where is this written into law? Does this mean we can only discuss Linux
kernels with Linus? Oracle with Larry? Windows with Bill?
And how is that ANYONE gets to define what a 'waste of time' is for me? I
don't remember seeing any charter for this ng saying what is and what is
not off-topic.... much less what is or what is not a 'waste of time.'
> so please stop your postings about this
> topic
Don't read the thread if you don't like it or don't want to contribute, but
may I politely please implore you to try not to dictate to anyone what can
and can't be posted here. The ng belongs to everyone... and no one.
Aren't Slackware people always proclaiming that 'choice is good'?
Al C. |