Al. C wrote:
> Trygve Selmer wrote:
>
>>You know, I know, and the rest of the group knows that discussing
>>Slackware's business model and other aspects of how Slackware as a
>>company is run in this NG is a waste of time. This discussion can only
>>be held with mister Volkerding,
>
> Uh, where is this written into law? Does this mean we can only discuss Linux
> kernels with Linus? Oracle with Larry? Windows with Bill?

No, but since PV don't read this NG, the discussion is hypothetical. And
the subject is still "Slackware Update".

> And how is that ANYONE gets to define what a 'waste of time' is for me? I
> don't remember seeing any charter for this ng saying what is and what is
> not off-topic.... much less what is or what is not a 'waste of time.'

I don't "define" it for you, but possibly for the rest of the group.

>>so please stop your postings about this topic
>
> Don't read the thread if you don't like it or don't want to contribute, but
> may I politely please implore you to try not to dictate to anyone what can
> and can't be posted here. The ng belongs to everyone... and no one.

Normally I don't read your postings, but this thread was active for 18
hours before you desided to change the subject and start one of your
personal discussions.

> Aren't Slackware people always proclaiming that 'choice is good'?