narke wrote:
> i use FVWM as primary windows manager, there the fonts looks beautiful.
> but occasionally i need to run KDE and Gnome, esspecailly i need to run
> lots of KDE and Gnome apps. In KDE and Gnome, however, i found the
> fonts looks ugly. the gtk-2.0/gtkrc configurated a 'bitstream vera
> san' for the only 'user-font' secion. now i want to ask,
>
> 1, is there any differences between FVWM and KDE in the sense of
> handling fonts. why FVWM look good whereas KDE looks ugly?
>
> 2, where can i check what fonts the FVWM used? if so, i guess i can let
> KDE to use it. right?
>
> -
> narke
>

In 10.1 you may want to:

man fontconfig
less /etc/fonts/fonts.conf
vim /etc/fonts/local.conf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<!-- /etc/fonts/local.conf overrides fonts.conf -->
<fontconfig>

<!-- additional directories -->
<dir>/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi</dir>
<dir>/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/cylillic</dir>
<dir>/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF</dir>

<!-- turn off antialias -->
<match target="font">
<edit name="antialias" mode="assign">
<bool>false</bool>
</edit>
</match>
</fontconfig>