On 2007-04-28, nordle <na@na.na> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:17:14 GMT
> Handover Phist <jason@NOSPAMwebsterscafe.com> wrote:
>
>> greymaus@gmaildo.tcom said "firefox"
>> >
>> > Anyone else think that Firefox is a resource hog?
>>
>> So use lynx or get a machine with resources.
>>
> Absolutely, I've had these apps open for 3-4hours so far, with the
> browsers now viewing the same pages:
>
> Amarok 1.4.5 RES=49 SHR=27
> Firefox 2.0.0.3 = RES=41 SHR=15
> Opera 9.2 = RES=53 SHR=22

Translate, please?
I have Opera open most times.. When I also open Firefox,
evveerryythiing sslloows down. Perhaps Opera is the hog?

>
> Firefox is not that much of a resource hog when compared with another
> capable (but I prefer not to use it) browser.


--
Greymaus
Just another grumpy old man