Unix Technical Forum

Re: lspv shows vpath?

This is a discussion on Re: lspv shows vpath? within the AIX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> yls177@hotmail.com (yls177) wrote in message news:<c06e4d68.0306210727.28302f9f@posting.google. com>... > iain@leamington-guide.com (Iain) wrote in message news:<a0a1407b.0306200438.f4e9eb1@posting.google.c om>... > > yls177@hotmail.com (yls177) ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > AIX Operating System

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2008, 07:52 PM
yls177
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: lspv shows vpath?

yls177@hotmail.com (yls177) wrote in message news:<c06e4d68.0306210727.28302f9f@posting.google. com>...
> iain@leamington-guide.com (Iain) wrote in message news:<a0a1407b.0306200438.f4e9eb1@posting.google.c om>...
> > yls177@hotmail.com (yls177) wrote in message news:<c06e4d68.0306191832.124db32@posting.google.c om>...
> > > i did a lspv and there are vpaths shown. are these vpaths connected to
> > > a SAN network?
> > >
> > >
> > > smit, data path devices, display data path device status

> >
> > I should think you would be in a better position to know that than
> > anyone else. Just because you have vpaths doesn't mean you have a
> > SAN. You have an ESS. The connection from your server to the ESS is
> > almost certainly either by SAN or by a direct SCSI connection.
> >
> > Iain.

>
>


yup, when i do a lsdev -Cc disk , i had lots of IBM FC 2105F20. does
that mean that we had lots of physical disks in our san?

also, when i do a lspv | grep 26
i got the below
1) hdisk26 none None
2) vpath26 abcd1234 vg06

lspv hdisk26 -> 0516-320 : Physical volume 0000000000000000 is not
assigned to
a volume group.

lspv vpath26 -> info about the volume group

on my other server with ssa, a lspv hdiskXX, gives info about the vg.
my understanding is that insan environment, the access path uses is
virtual path instead of the logical disk.


> correct me if i am wrong.. the purpose of ESS, is for really fast
> transfer. and therefore a SAN is almost inevitable.. with fibre
> channel being used instead of SCSI Connection

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2008, 07:57 PM
Iain
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: lspv shows vpath?

> > > > i did a lspv and there are vpaths shown. are these vpaths connected to
> > > > a SAN network?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > smit, data path devices, display data path device status
> > >
> > > I should think you would be in a better position to know that than
> > > anyone else. Just because you have vpaths doesn't mean you have a
> > > SAN. You have an ESS. The connection from your server to the ESS is
> > > almost certainly either by SAN or by a direct SCSI connection.
> > >
> > > Iain.

> >
> >

>
> yup, when i do a lsdev -Cc disk , i had lots of IBM FC 2105F20. does
> that mean that we had lots of physical disks in our san?


The number of physical disks in the ESS that are visible to your
server should be equal to the number of vpaths the server has
configued.

Try the command lsvpcfg.

There could be many other disks on the SAN which your server cannot
see.

>
> also, when i do a lspv | grep 26
> i got the below
> 1) hdisk26 none None
> 2) vpath26 abcd1234 vg06
>
> lspv hdisk26 -> 0516-320 : Physical volume 0000000000000000 is not
> assigned to
> a volume group.
>
> lspv vpath26 -> info about the volume group
>
> on my other server with ssa, a lspv hdiskXX, gives info about the vg.
> my understanding is that insan environment, the access path uses is
> virtual path instead of the logical disk.
>


You almost certainly have a SAN (you could have point-to-point fibre
but not very likely). However, you are slightly mistaken about one
thing. Having vpaths is nothing to do with having a SAN. Vpaths come
from the SDD (Subsystem Device Driver) software which is installed on
the server and normally used with ESSs. It can be used if you have a
SAN, SCSI or point-to-point fibre connections. The vpaths give you
multiple routes to each ESS LUN, so if one path fails, you can still
access the disk via another path.

>
> > correct me if i am wrong.. the purpose of ESS, is for really fast
> > transfer. and therefore a SAN is almost inevitable.. with fibre
> > channel being used instead of SCSI Connection


I don't think that's quite right. In my experience, having switched
between the two a number of times, performance is quite similar on the
latest SCSI vs the latest fibre/SAN connections (at least when
connecting a server to an ESS).

What the SAN does give you is manageability. For example, the number
of servers you can connect to the ESS is not limited by the number of
adapters on the ESS. With a SAN you can have lots of servers
connected, all with multiple paths to the ESS. You can also reassign
storage to different servers, or to multiple servers, very easily.

Iain.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com