This is a discussion on mklpp problems? within the AIX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> I'm trying to create packages for installp using mklpp and using the lpp_name below. The mklpp commands makes the ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| I'm trying to create packages for installp using mklpp and using the lpp_name below. The mklpp commands makes the lpp without problems, but inutoc will not create the .toc file. Inutoc complains: 0503-005 inutoc: The format of the toc file is invalid. Any idea what's going on? (aix 5.2ML4) (mklpp-1.2.9.0) ------------------------------------- orig file ------------ 5 R I tmp.local { tmp.local.rte 01.00.0000.0000 01 N U en_US Testing building packages [ % % % % ] } ------------------------------------- orig file ------------ ------------------------------------- expanded file -------- 5 R I tmp.local { tmp.local.rte 01.00.0000.0000 01 N U en_US Testing building packages [ % /usr 4 /usr/lpp 2 /usr/lpp/tmp.local /usr/local 2 /usr/local/mikee 2 /usr/local/mikee/local 12 /usr/local/mikee/local/include 148 /usr/local/mikee/local/lib 573 /usr/local/mikee/local/lib/pkgconfig 1 /usr/local/mikee/local/share 6 /usr/local/mikee/local/share/man 2 /usr/local/mikee/local/share/man/man3 9 /usr/local/mikee/local/share/cvs 2 /usr/local/mikee/local/share/cvs/contrib 341 /usr/local/mikee/local/share/doc 2 /usr/local/mikee/local/share/doc/mxml 343 /usr/local/mikee/local/bin 6672 /usr/local/mikee/local/man 13 /usr/local/mikee/local/man/man1 365 /usr/local/mikee/local/man/man5 50 /usr/local/mikee/local/man/man8 14 /usr/local/mikee/local/man/cat1 4 /usr/local/mikee/local/man/cat3 14 /usr/local/mikee/local/man/man3 11 /usr/local/mikee/local/info 347 INSTWORK 153 153 % % % ] } -------------------------------------- expanded file ------- |
| |||
| Mike wrote: > I'm trying to create packages for installp using mklpp > and using the lpp_name below. The mklpp commands makes > the lpp without problems, but inutoc will not create > the .toc file. Inutoc complains: > 0503-005 inutoc: The format of the toc file is invalid. > Any idea what's going on? : > ------------------------------------- orig file ------------ > 5 R I tmp.local { > tmp.local.rte 01.00.0000.0000 01 N U en_US Testing building packages > [ > % > % > % > % > ] > } > ------------------------------------- orig file ------------ The problem is the first character ('5') of the lpp_name file. The IBM AIX pub: http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...de3b433190mela says this: Field Name Format Separator Description 1. Format Integer White space Indicates the release level of installp for which this package was built. The values are: * 1 - AIX 3.1 * 3 - AIX 3.2 * 4 - AIX 4.1 and later Note the "4" is 'AIX 4.1 and later'. There is no '5' for that field. Paul Landay |
| ||||
| In article <4207A887.3010508@us.ibm.com>, Paul Landay wrote: > Mike wrote: >> I'm trying to create packages for installp using mklpp >> and using the lpp_name below. The mklpp commands makes >> the lpp without problems, but inutoc will not create >> the .toc file. Inutoc complains: >> 0503-005 inutoc: The format of the toc file is invalid. >> Any idea what's going on? > : >> ------------------------------------- orig file ------------ >> 5 R I tmp.local { >> tmp.local.rte 01.00.0000.0000 01 N U en_US Testing building packages >> [ >> % >> % >> % >> % >> ] >> } >> ------------------------------------- orig file ------------ > > The problem is the first character ('5') of the lpp_name file. > The IBM AIX pub: > http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infoce...de3b433190mela > says this: > Field Name Format Separator Description > 1. Format Integer White space Indicates the release > level of installp for which this package was built. The values are: > * 1 - AIX 3.1 > * 3 - AIX 3.2 > * 4 - AIX 4.1 and later > Note the "4" is 'AIX 4.1 and later'. There is no '5' for that field. > > Paul Landay I should have read the manual more closely. I had seen the 2, 3, 4 and thought the manual was out of date, that's why I put the 5 there. It works great with a 4. Thanks. Mike |