- Re: Rtree index method for inet/cidr
- Packaging begins in 4 hours ...
- Bug in create operator and/or initdb
- Re: [BUGS] Bug in create operator and/or initdb
- Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)
- Re: [BUGS] Bug in create operator and/or initdb
- Re: Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)
- Re: Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0)
- Re: [BUGS] Bug in create operator and/or initdb
- Re: [BUGS] Bug in create operator and/or initdb
- Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Security Release Packaging ...
- Re: Security Release Packaging ...
- Security bugs in tsearch2
- Re: Implementing Bitmap Indexes
- Allowing VACUUM to time out when waiting for locks?
- Re: Allowing VACUUM to time out when waiting for locks?
- Re: Allowing VACUUM to time out when waiting for locks?
- Implementing Bitmap Indexes
- Re: Group-count estimation statistics
- Re: working on support triggers on columns
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- -HEAD on FreeBSD 6-CURRENT build failures
- Re: -HEAD on FreeBSD 6-CURRENT build failures
- Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
- Re: WAL: O_DIRECT and multipage-writer
- Re: [pgsql-hackers] Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema
- Re: -HEAD on FreeBSD 6-CURRENT build failures
- Re: [pgsql-hackers] Group-count estimation statistics
- Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
- Re: -HEAD on FreeBSD 6-CURRENT build failures
- Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
- Re: [pgsql-hackers] Group-count estimation statistics
- Group-count estimation statistics
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
- storage of compiled functions
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Permissions on aggregate component functions
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Re: Strange issue with initdb on 8.0 and Solaris automounts
- Re: Permissions on aggregate component functions
- Re: [PATCHES] WAL: O_DIRECT and multipage-writer
- Re: [pgsql-hackers] Patent issues and 8.1
- strange 'vacuum verbose analyze' behaviour
- Re: Allow GRANT/REVOKE permissions to be applied to all schema objects with one command
- Status of PostgreSQL for 4+ processors
- Re: Status of PostgreSQL for 4+ processors
- Re: WAL: O_DIRECT and multipage-writer
- Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2
- Re: [GENERAL] visualizing B-tree index coverage
- Backporting pg_dump to 7.4
- IBM patent
- Re: Patent issues and 8.1
- cvs TIP, tsearch2 and Solaris 8 Sparc
- Deferrable Unique Constraints
- Data statement format used by the .sh scripts
- Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2
- Performance of the temporary table creation and use.
- Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2
- Vacuum Looping 7.4
- Re: Vacuum Looping 7.4
- OLS BOF for linux & postgresql
- Re: Performance of the temporary table creation and use.
- (NONE)
- Re: Patent issues and 8.1
- Free Playstation 3 (PS3) here !
- Patent issues and 8.1
- Heads up: upcoming releases in all branches back to 7.2
- Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2
- Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2
- Re: Heads up: upcoming releases in all branches back to 7.2
- Is this a bug?
- strxfrm implementation
- Re: Is this a bug?
- Re: Is this a bug?
- improved support for compounds in tsearch2
- Re: how to set password while loging into database
- Re: psql 8.0 final not working on NT 4.0sp6
- how to add a new column in pg_proc table
- bug w/ cursors and savepoints
- Re: userlock changes for 8.1/8.2
- RQ: Prepared statements used by multiple connections
- Re: RQ: Prepared statements used by multiple connections
- Re: Proposed TODO: fetch->INT8
- Re: bug w/ cursors and savepoints
- Built-in casts for ltree
- Re: bug w/ cursors and savepoints
- In NYC Monday to Wednesday
- Re: Some things I like to pick from the TODO list ...
- Concurrent free-lock
- userlock changes for 8.1/8.2
- Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Disallow LOAD to non-superusers.
- Re: can plpgsql returns more flexibe value ?
- Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Disallow LOAD to non-superusers.
- Hackers in London/Oxford
- Proposed TODO: fetch->INT8
- Re: Concurrent free-lock
- Re: Hackers in London/Oxford
- Goals for 8.1
- Shortcut for defining triggers
- Re: [pgsql-hackers] Re: Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2
- Re: can plpgsql returns more flexibe value ?
- Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
- Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
- Re: [PATCHES] Merge pg_shadow && pg_group -- UNTESTED
- French site with postgresql name
- pg_clog problem (PG version 7.4.5)
- Re: can plpgsql returns more flexibe value ?
- Re: TIP9
- Re: can plpgsql returns more flexibe value ?
- Autotuning Group Commit
- Locale agnostic unicode text
- Re: ARC patent
- Extending System Views: proposal for 8.1/8.2
- Re: [pgsql-hackers] Re: Translations at pgfoundry
- 8.1 development cycle (was a couple of other threads ;))
- can plpgsql returns more flexibe value ?
- Re: Translations at pgfoundry (was Re: [PATCHES] Latest Turkish translation updates)
- Re: ARC patent
- It's OSCON Submission time again!
- Re: [GENERAL] Ways to check the status of a long-running transaction
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: [pgsql-hackers] Daily digest v1.4918 (23 messages)
- Re: Refactoring
- Re: Addition to TODO
- Two-phase commit for 8.1
- Caching of frequently used objects
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Addition to TODO
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- OS/2 port
- Re: psql 8.0 final not working on NT 4.0sp6
- buildfarm enhancements
- Viewupdate: Inherit default expressions from columns
- Some things I like to pick from the TODO list ...
- Re: psql 8.0 final not working on NT 4.0sp6
- Re: psql 8.0 final not working on NT 4.0sp6
- Re: psql 8.0 final not working on NT 4.0sp6
- psql 8.0 final not working on NT 4.0sp6
- Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?
- Branch created ...
- Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?
- Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?
- Re: Is CVS HEAD open for 8.1 commits?
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ...
- US Patents vs Non-US software ...
- Re: US Patents vs Non-US software ...
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- Software patents are one of the great evils.
- Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] %2$, %1$ gettext placeholder replacement is not working under Win32
- Contrib make inconsistency
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- Ladies & Gentlemen, May I present ...
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- Re: ARC patent
- 4 hour countdown
- Re: [PATCHES] Latest Turkish translation updates
- Re: ARC patent
- Time to branch for 8.1?
- Re: pgdump
- Re: OS/2 port regression tests
- WAL logging of heap_mark4update
- Encodings and docs
- Re: WAL logging of heap_mark4update
- Re: [PORTS] 8.0.0rc4 / OpenBSD 3.6 / amd64 success
- On schedule for 8.0.0 packaging on Monday
- Re: PostgreSQL Specification
- PostgreSQL Specification
- Re: IBM releases 500 patents
- Time span conversion function
- pgdump
- Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)
- Has anybody tried porting PostgreSQL to a "stack machine" or "accumulatormachine"?
- Re: Has anybody tried porting PostgreSQL to a "stack machine"
- FATAL: catalog is missing 1 attribute(s) for relid 16396
- Top-k optimizations?
- Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)
- Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)
- Re: Bug? 8.0 does not use partial index
- Bug? 8.0 does not use partial index
- Re: Win32 config file extension, capitalization
- some linker troubles with rc5 on sun studio 9 ...
- SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_Re:__SUSE_port_(was_[ANNOUNCE]_PostgreSQL_8=2E0=2E0_Release_Candidate_5)?=
- Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: problem with casts dump/restore
- port report: Linux SuSE 9.1
- PANIC: right sibling's left-link doesn't match
- looking for rh9 rpms for pgadmin v 1.2
- sparse (static analyzer) report
- =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_Re:_SUSE_port_(was_[ANNOUNCE]_PostgreSQL_8=2E0=2E0_Release_Candidate_5)?=
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)
- Re: looking for rh9 rpms for pgadmin v 1.2
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: PANIC: right sibling's left-link doesn't match
- Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: problem with casts dump/restore
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- problem with casts dump/restore
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- buildfarm switching servers
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: IBM releases 500 patents
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: segfault caused by heimdal (was: SUSE port)
- Re: problem with casts dump/restore
- Re: looking for rh9 rpms for pgadmin v 1.2
- Re: looking for rh9 rpms for pgadmin v 1.2
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- Re: Much Ado About COUNT(*)
- IBM releases 500 patents
- RC5 Bundled ...
- Verbosity of column definition mismatch error
- Re: Verbosity of column definition mismatch error
- Returning multiple rowsets from a function
- Re: RC5 Bundled ...
- tsearch2 portability bug
- "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified
- Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..
- Re: "SMgrRelation hashtable corrupted" failure identified
- Re: [PORTS] PostgreSQL 8 for Win32 -- installation problem
- unsubscribe
- Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [BUGS] More SSL questions..