- M'I.5,Perse cution Haras sment t hrough the Radio
- M,I-5 Pers ecution Thr ee Years of MI5 P ersecution Fax es
- M`I 5`Pe rsecution . MI5 Wan t Me to Send Yo u the se Fa xes
- M I.5 Perse cution MI 5 Insi st tha t th ese Fax es mu st Continu e
- M I`5'Pers ecution , 22, 544 + 837 = 23,38 1
- Re: [GENERAL] Can't make backup
- Commit takes a long time.
- Linux/PostgreSQL scalability issue - problem with 8 cores
- M`I'5`Per secution ` Molestatio n durin g Tr avel
- M I`5,P ersecution M I5 a re A fraid to Adm it T heyre Behi nd the Persecution
- M`I'5`Persecu tion ` No Justic e f or the Vic tims of MI 5
- M-I'5.Persecuti on . MI 5 H ave Syst ematically Destroy ed My Life
- pg_dump performance
- With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
- Anyone running on RHEL Cluster?
- M I-5,Persecutio n Compari ng the MI 5 Persecuti on wit h German Final Soluti on
- M-I'5.Persecut ion . MI5 Wast e Taxp ayer M illions on Pointless Hate-Ca mpaign
- M-I 5`Persecutio n - Fo ur Years of MI 5 P ersecution Posts on Interne t Newsgrou ps
- M'I`5 Persecu tion , BBC N ewscasters L ie & Deny The yre Watchi ng Me
- More shared buffers causes lower performances
- Re: function body actors (was: viewing source code)
- Re: function body actors (was: viewing source code)
- Re: viewing source code
- performance index scan vs bitmap-seq scan.
- Minimizing dead tuples caused by update triggers
- Reinitialising stats once only without restarting
- Re: viewing source code
- Re: viewing source code
- Re: viewing source code
- Re: viewing source code
- Re: viewing source code
- Re: viewing source code
- Optimising a query
- Dual core Opterons beating quad core Xeons?
- Re: viewing source code
- Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
- Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005)
- Re: viewing source code
- Re: update 600000 rows
- Re: SELECT * FROM table is too slow
- Re: update 600000 rows
- SELECT * FROM table is too slow
- explanation for seeks in VACUUM
- Re: viewing source code
- VACUUM FREEZE output more than double input
- update 600000 rows
- Putting files into fields in a table
- viewing source code
- Re: viewing source code
- Large Objects and Toast
- Heavy write activity on first vacuum of fresh TOAST data
- URI to kind of a benchmark
- Need help on parameters and their values to tune the postgresql database
- Limited performance on multi core server
- vacuumdb and autovacuum?
- Benchmarking PG
- Slow Query
- Measuring table and index bloat
- Combining two bitmap scans out performs a single regular index scan?
- Vacuum full since 15 hours
- Index on VARCHAR with text_pattern_ops inside PL/PGSQL procedure.
- Cost-Based Vacuum Delay tuning
- Trouble with LEFT JOIN using VIEWS.
- database tuning
- Re: Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not2005)
- Re: Optimizer Not using the Right plan
- Evaluation of PG performance vs MSDE/MSSQL 2000 (not 2005)
- Bad query plans for queries on partitioned table
- Optimizer Not using the Right plan
- RAID arrays and performance
- PostgreSQL 8.2.5 slow performance on INSERT on Linux
- EXPLAIN ANALYZE time calculations
- Dealing with big tables
- Utilizing multiple cores for one query
- clear pg_stats
- Appending "LIMIT" to query drastically decreases performance
- Configuring a Large RAM PostgreSQL Server
- 7.4 Checkpoint Question
- Optimizer regression 8.2.1 -> 8.2.3 on TSEARCH2 queries with ORDER BY and LIMIT
- Windows XP selects are very slow
- GiST indexing tuples
- PostgreSQL performance on various distribution stock kernels
- 8.1 planner problem ?
- Query only slow on first run
- Base de Datos Transaccional
- doubt with pg_dump and high concurrent used databases
- TB-sized databases
- Re: tuning for TPC-C benchmark
- Performance problem with UNION ALL view and domains
- Problems with PostGreSQL and Windows 2003
- Increasing the database connections
- MI5 Persecution: Faxes Sent to Media1 (6307)
- MI5 Persecution: Faxes Sent to Media2 (8482)
- Postgres ignoring index when using left outer join.
- tuning for TPC-C benchmark
- MI5 Persecution: Victor Lewis-Smith (36757)
- MI5 Persecution: Balham Bus 8/7/99 (12832)
- MI5 Persecution: Clapham South 17/2/00 (15007)
- MI5 Persecution: Clapham Junction 6/5/00 (17182)
- MI5 Persecution: he's an idiot you know 3/11/00 (19357)
- MI5 Persecution: tinker tailor wanker thief 2/12/00 (21532)
- MI5 Persecution: Jon Holmes (4-5/Jan/2002) (23707)
- MI5 Persecution: Post Office 14/11/02 (25882)
- MI5 Persecution: Eclipse pub 20/12/02 (28057)
- MI5 Persecution: Barbican Library 6/2/2003 (30232)
- MI5 Persecution: Bernard Levin - The Times (32407)
- MI5 Persecution: Come back, Norma! (34582)
- MI5 Persecution: Introduction to Sent Faxes (1957)
- MI5 Persecution: Faxes Sent to Diplomatic/Legal (4132)
- =?windows-1256?Q?Performance_problem_(outer_join_+_view_+_no n-strict_func?==?windows-1256?Q?tions)=FE?=
- MI5 Persecution: BA984 LHR->TXL 13/6/98 (1957)
- MI5 Persecution: BHS Croydon 18/12/98 (4132)
- MI5 Persecution: Ravenscourt Park 20/3/99 (6307)
- MI5 Persecution: Battersea Library 29/3/99 (8482)
- MI5 Persecution: Royal Festival Hall 15/4/99 (10657)
- Clustered/covering indexes (or lack thereof :-)
- autovacuum: recommended?
- random_page_cost etc. per tablespace?
- ERROR: "invalid memory alloc request size" or "unexpected end ofdata" on large table
- difference between a unique constraint and a unique index ???
- MI5 Persecution: Neil Fox (Nov/1998) (1955)
- MI5 Persecution: Flying Eye (Mar/1999) (4129)
- MI5 Persecution: Johnny Boy (21/Aug/1998) (6303)
- MI5 Persecution: Johnny Boy (19/June/1999) (8477)
- MI5 Persecution: Brighton 24/9/98 (10651)
- MI5 Persecution: POSK 2/2/98 (12825)
- MI5 Persecution: Leicester Square 9/2/98 (14999)
- Can I Determine if AutoVacuum Does Anything?
- Curious about dead rows.
- work_mem and shared_buffers
- Help understanding stat numbers
- PostgreSQL vs MySQL, and FreeBSD
- Join performance
- Need to run CLUSTER to keep performance
- Subpar Execution Plan
- Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1
- Estimation problem with a LIKE clause containing a /
- dell versus hp
- Re: Postgresql.conf Settings
- Migrating to 8.3 - checkpoints and background writer
- Database connections and stored procs (functions)
- index stat
- Which index methodology is better?-
- hp ciss on freebsd
- Training Recommendations
- Re: Hardware for PostgreSQL (RAID configurations)
- Union within View vs.Union of Views
- "MixedCase sensitive quoted" names
- hardware for PostgreSQL
- Unfortunate expansion of composite types in union
- How to avoid hashjoin and mergejoin
- select max(field) from table much faster with a group by clause?
- [Fwd: Re: Outer joins and Seq scans]
- Hardware for PostgreSQL
- tables with 300+ partitions
- Two fast queries get slow when combined
- Optimizing PostgreSQL for Windows
- High Availability and Load Balancing
- Improving Query
- Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_fieldDESCLIMIT 1
- Append Cost in query planners
- Outer joins and Seq scans
- Speed difference between select ... union select ... and select frompartitioned_table
- Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1
- Suggestions on an update query
- Re: partitioned table and ORDER BY indexed_field DESCLIMIT 1
- PostgreSQL 8.3beta1 on Solaris testing case study
- 8.3beta1 testing on Solaris
- Bunching "transactions"
- Seq scan is used for "select count(*) from table" queries
- multiple apaches against single postgres database
- Finalizing commit taking very long
- Re: [SQL] two queryes in a single tablescan
- Re: need help with a query
- Memory Settings....
- Seqscan
- Re: need help with a query
- 12 hour table vacuums
- need help with a query
- Re: need help with a query
- how to improve the performance of creating index
- How to improve speed of 3 table join &group (HUGE tables)
- Re: two queryes in a single tablescan
- Incorrect estimates on columns
- Re: two queryes in a single tablescan
- Re: two queryes in a single tablescan
- Re: Vacuum goes worse
- using a stored proc that returns a result set in acomplex SQL stmt
- Select * query extremely slow only for some records on small,simple table - why?
- Autovacuum running out of memory
- Vacuum goes worse
- Exam Results
- Re: How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table?
- How to speed up min/max(id) in 50M rows table?
- Huge amount of memory consumed during transaction
- building a performance test suite
- Performance problems with prepared statements
- Shared Buffer setting in postgresql.conf
- hashjoin chosen over 1000x faster plan
- Postgres running Very slowly
- SQL Monitoring
- Re: Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication
- postgresql on NFS.. recommended? not recommended?
- A Must Read-MCSD!!!
- Apache2 PostgreSQL http authentication
- query plan worse after analyze
- Problems with + 1 million record table
- Slow TSearch2 performance for table with 1 million documents.
- quickly getting the top N rows
- Partitioning in postgres - basic question
- Tuning Help - What did I do wrong?
- can't shrink relation
- Query taking too long. Problem reading explain output.
- Re: Newbie question about degraded performance on delete statement. (SOLVED)
- Difference between Vacuum and Vacuum full
- Newbie question about degraded performance on delete statement.
- performance of like queries
- Partitioned table limitation
- Non-blocking vacuum full
- OOM Errors as a result of table inheritance and a bad plan(?)
- Postgres 7.4.2 hanging when vacuum full is run
- sequence query performance issues
- Tuning for warm standby
- Difference in query plan when using = or > in where clause
- Incorrect row estimates in plan?
- Attempting to disable count triggers on cleanup
- Poor performance with ON DELETE CASCADE
- Acceptable level of over-estimation?
- TEXT or LONGTEXT?
- Re: Low CPU Usage
- select count(*) performance (vacuum did not help)
- Re: Low CPU Usage
- SQL query required
- zero value in statistics collector's result
- Possible explanations for catastrophic performace deterioration?
- Re: Query planner unaware of possibly best plan
- Re: Low CPU Usage
- Re: Low CPU Usage
- Re: Low CPU Usage
- Re: Low CPU Usage
- Re: Low CPU Usage
- Re: Low CPU Usage
- Query planner unaware of possibly best plan
- Re: Upgraded from 7.4 to 8.1.4 QUERIES NOW SLOW!!!
- Searching for the cause of a bad plan
- Linux mis-reporting memory
- query io stats and finding a slow query
- Upgraded from 7.4 to 8.1.4 QUERIES NOW SLOW!!!
- Re: Low CPU Usage
- REPOST: Nested loops row estimates always too high