- "append" takes a lot of time in a query
- Creating indexes
- Re: [GENERAL] Ubuntu question
- Creating a foreign key
- =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Query_Optimization_with_Kruskal=92s_Algorit hm?=
- pgfouine - commit details?
- Possible Redundancy/Performance Solution
- What constitutes a complex query
- multiple joins + Order by + LIMIT query performance issue
- Seqscan problem
- plan difference between set-returning function with ROWS within IN() and a plain join
- need to speed up query
- Backup causing poor performance - suggestions
- Fastest way / best practice to calculate "next birthdays"
- Very slow INFORMATION_SCHEMA
- Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1
- Re: Pros and Cons of 8.3.1
- two memory-consuming postgres processes
- Pros and Cons of 8.3.1
- pgPool query cache
- Please ignore ...
- Postgres replication
- Understanding histograms
- SSD database benchmarks
- Vacuum statistics
- Postgres Benchmark looking for maintainer
- Very poor performance loading 100M of sql data using copy
- shared_buffer/DRBD performances
- Where do a novice do to make it run faster?
- Replication Syatem
- Simple JOIN problem
- Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Benchmarks WAS: Sun Talks about MySQL
- Re: Best practice to load a huge table from ORACLE to PG
- Best practice to load a huge table from ORACLE to PG
- Planner won't use composite index if there is an order by ????
- Re: off-topic: SPAM
- Question about disk IO an index use and seeking advice
- Optimizer's issue
- mysterious difference in speed when combining two queries with OR
- SELECT 'DBD::Pg ping test'
- [PERFORMANCE] Error loading 37G CSV file "invalid string enlargement request size 65536"
- Suspicious top output
- CPU bound at 99%
- Re: [HACKERS] [COMMITTERS] pgsql: FixTransactionIdIsCurrentTransactionId() to use binary search
- Performance of the Materialize operator in a query plan
- connections slowing everything down?
- Re: Group by more efficient than distinct?
- corrupted shared memory message
- Re: Group by more efficient than distinct?
- Re: Group by more efficient than distinct?
- Re: Exact index overhead
- Query running slow
- Anybody using the Dell Powervault MD3000 array?
- Re: Performance increase with elevator=deadline
- SQL Function Slowness, 8.3.0
- Background writer underemphasized ...
- Oddly slow queries
- Re: Performance is low Postgres+Solaris
- Re: Cached Query Plans
- db size
- shared_buffers performance
- Re: Performance increase with elevator=deadline
- Partitioned tables - planner wont use indexes
- Re: Performance is low Postgres+Solaris
- Re: Performance is low Postgres+Solaris
- Re: Performance increase with elevator=deadline
- shared_buffers in 8.2.x
- Creating large database of MD5 hash values
- varchar index joins not working?
- EXPLAIN detail
- Re: EXPLAIN detail
- Re: EXPLAIN detail
- large tables and simple "= constant" queries using indexes
- bulk data loading
- bulk insert performance problem
- recommendations for web/db connection pooling or DBD::Gofer reviews
- performance using table partitions in Postgres 8.2.6
- what worked: performance improvements for geo-spatial searching onFreeBSD
- Performance with temporary table
- slow pgsql tables - need to vacuum?
- Partitioned tables - planner wont use indexes
- Forcing more agressive index scans for BITMAP AND
- Severe performance problems for simple query
- Looking for bottleneck during load test
- [Fwd: Re: Max shared_buffers]
- Forcing more agressive index scans for BITMAP AND
- Query plan excluding index on view
- Too many commands in a transaction
- SSDs
- Re: Bad prepare performance
- check performance parameters
- Insert time
- Cursors and different settings for default_statistics_target
- Performance Implications of Using Exceptions
- Bad prepare performance
- optimizing query performance
- POSIX file updates
- using like in a prepare doesnt' use the right index
- Planning a new server - help needed
- Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
- Preparing statements on connection startup
- 1-/2-dimensional indexes for common columns, rationale?
- Query Optimization
- how can a couple of expensive queries drag my system down?
- vacuum in Postgresql 8.0.x slowing down the database
- "Slow" query or just "Bad hardware"?
- what is the maximum number of rows in a table in postgresql 8.1
- postgresql is slow with larger table even it is in RAM
- Re: slow pg_connect()
- Turn correlated in subquery into join
- Planning hot/live backups?
- increasing shared buffer slow downs query performance.
- waiting for harddisk
- Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
- Re: PostgreSQL NetApp and NFS
- Re: PG writes a lot to the disk
- Having MANY MANY empty columns in database
- slow pg_connect()
- Views and functions returning sets of records
- performance tools
- Live Webcam broadcasts. Contain erotic content.
- best way to run maintenance script
- What is the best way to storage music files in Postgresql
- Adaptec 5805 SAS Raid
- The "many nulls" problem
- Re: Lots of "semop" calls under load
- Re: Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0
- temp tables
- ER diagram tool
- partial index + select query performance
- Are piped columns indexable
- Repeated execution of identical subqueries
- Recomendations on raid controllers raid 1+0
- 8.3 write performance
- 8.3 write performance
- Hardware question for a DB server
- Can SQL 2000 32bit run on 64 bit os?
- Re: list user created triggers
- migration of 7.4 to 8.1
- list user created triggers
- how many index can have????
- join query performance
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Confirma=E7=E3o_de_envio_/_Sending_con?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?firmation_(captchaid:13266b402bd3)?=
- Re: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Confirma?==?iso-8859-1?B?5+M=?==?iso-8859-1?Q?o?= de envio / Sending confirmation
- Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow
- Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow
- Utility functions for enabling/disabling fkey triggers
- Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow
- Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speedreturns to ~500 tuples/second after commit
- Joins and DELETE FROM
- Improve Full text rank in a query
- database design for large data.
- Toast space grows
- Nested loop vs merge join: inconsistencies between estimated andactual time
- index usage makes problem
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Confirma=E7=E3o_de_envio_/_Sending_con?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?firmation_(captchaid:13266b203c28)?=
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Confirma=E7=E3o_de_envio_/_Sending_con?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?firmation_(captchaid:13266b1124bc)?=
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Confirma=E7=E3o_de_envio_/_Sending_con?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?firmation_(captchaid:13266b203e23)?=
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Confirma=E7=E3o_de_envio_/_Sending_con?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?firmation_(captchaid:13266b20536d)?=
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Confirma=E7=E3o_de_envio_/_Sending_con?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?firmation_(captchaid:13266b2056e4)?=
- oid...any optimizations
- postgresql Explain command output
- Why the difference in plans ?
- count * performance issue
- Optimisation help
- =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Confirma=E7=E3o_de_envio_/_Sending_con?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?firmation_(captchaid:13266b111e1d)?=
- postgresql performance
- Ramifications of turning off Nested Loops for slow queries
- PostgreSQL performance on a virtual host
- Performance problems deleting data
- Performance tuning on FreeBSD
- which is more important? freq of checkpoints or the duration of them?
- You can find new hookups with the hottest men, women and couples.
- How to choose a disc array for Postgresql?
- Bypassing useless ORDER BY in a VIEW
- 12 disks raid setup
- how to identify expensive steps in an explain analyze output
- questions about CLUSTER
- Optimizing t1.col like '%t2.col%'
- t1.col like '%t2.col%'
- disabling an index without deleting it?
- PG planning randomly ?
- multi-threaded pgloader needs your tests
- Re: LISTEN / NOTIFY performance in 8.3
- Re: LISTEN / NOTIFY performance in 8.3
- response time when querying via JDBC and via psql differs
- when is a DELETE FK trigger planned?
- Very simple query, plan goes badly wrong
- date; q=dns/txt; s=mail; bh=VJAfUBalD9Zqq+rAD+bu/vgvY7o=; b=RVmU7bJ9fNBG6FG9MbPZzlVn8PEL6Q8c4LVJ7e2D36L7H9U5 Xsna2I1lbiRdWzICZgZbeFJLqSrGaSYVPkoeohDuP7vTfIVtkb x6ciOY7EsDTui+u6YlbN5qcNOfX5yqvKWG5Xv/TgN1twRmBWwCv87CEoQKrfBblEM5bjGF7a0=
- LISTEN / NOTIFY performance in 8.3
- config settings, was: 4s query want to run faster
- store A LOT of 3-tuples for comparisons
- CORRECTION to msg 'loading same instance of dump to two different servers simultaneously'
- Q on views and performance
- 4s query want to run faster
- Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
- Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
- Question about shared_buffers and cpu usage
- planner favors seq scan too early
- Re: mis-estimate in nested query causes slow runtimes
- Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
- Re: Anyone using a SAN?
- Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
- Re: Anyone using a SAN?
- Re: Anyone using a SAN?
- Need Help selecting Large Data From PQSQL
- Re: 7 hrs for a pg_restore?
- nested sets model UPDATEs
- Re: JDBC/Stored procedure performance issue
- Re: How do I bulk insert to a table withoutaffecting read performance on that table?
- Storage space usage
- slow 8.2.6 with 50 connections
- Benchmark Data requested
- Configuration settings (shared_buffers, etc) in Linux: puzzled
- *_cost recommendation with 8.3 and a fully cached db
- planner chooses unoptimal plan on joins with complex key
- Vacuum and FSM page size
- Postgres 8.2 memory weirdness
- Optimizing queries that use temporary tables
- Workaround for cross column stats dependency
- Making the most of memory?
- scheduler
- 8.3 synchronous_commit
- Slow performance with left outer join
- Slow set-returning functions
- Re: strange pauses
- [OT] RAID controllers blocking one another?
- strange pauses
- Seq scans on indexed columns.
- Saving result set of SELECT to table column
- Tuning Postgresql on Windows XP Pro 32 bit [was on HACKERS list]
- Re: Simple select, but takes long time
- Inheritance, unique keys and performance
- Simple select, but takes long time
- Re: Best way to index IP data?
- not exists clause
- Evaluating boolean formula: slow performance
- Best way to index IP data?
- After Vacuum Analyse - Procedure performance not improved - Innner select is faster
- big database performance
- Search for fixed set of keywords
- Loss of cache when persistent connexion is closed
- Performance of aggregates over set-returning functions
- Create Index (Hash) on a Large Table Taking Days...
- concurrent inserts into two separate tables are very slow
- M'I.5,Perse cution Haras sment t hrough the Radio
- M,I-5 Pers ecution Thr ee Years of MI5 P ersecution Fax es
- M`I 5`Pe rsecution . MI5 Wan t Me to Send Yo u the se Fa xes
- M I.5 Perse cution MI 5 Insi st tha t th ese Fax es mu st Continu e
- M I`5'Pers ecution , 22, 544 + 837 = 23,38 1