Unix Technical Forum

Patching errors

This is a discussion on Patching errors within the comp.unix.solaris forums, part of the Solaris Operating System category; --> I'm applying patches to a Solaris 8 server using smpatch to bring it up to date. Most of the ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Solaris Operating System > comp.unix.solaris

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:54 AM
oracledba.williams@gmail.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Patching errors

I'm applying patches to a Solaris 8 server using smpatch to bring it
up to date.

Most of the patches went fine, but a few produced the following error
message:

add patch 111097-25
SUNWcsr: failed to add tomtppm to /etc/name_to_major:
(tomtppm) already in use as a driver or alias.
SUNWcsr: failed to add m1535ppm to /etc/name_to_major:
(m1535ppm) already in use as a driver or alias.
SUNWcsr: failed to add ics951601 to /etc/name_to_major:
(ics951601) already in use as a driver or alias.
SUNWcsr: failed to add adm1031 to /etc/name_to_major:
(adm1031) already in use as a driver or alias.

My script performed a reboot after all the patches were added, and the
good news is the server came back up.

Can anyone suggest what I should do next?

Dennis Williams

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:54 AM
0xDEADABE
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Patching errors

oracledba.williams@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm applying patches to a Solaris 8 server using smpatch to bring it
> up to date.
>
> Most of the patches went fine, but a few produced the following error
> message:
>
> add patch 111097-25
> SUNWcsr: failed to add tomtppm to /etc/name_to_major:
> (tomtppm) already in use as a driver or alias.
> SUNWcsr: failed to add m1535ppm to /etc/name_to_major:
> (m1535ppm) already in use as a driver or alias.
> SUNWcsr: failed to add ics951601 to /etc/name_to_major:
> (ics951601) already in use as a driver or alias.
> SUNWcsr: failed to add adm1031 to /etc/name_to_major:
> (adm1031) already in use as a driver or alias.
>
> My script performed a reboot after all the patches were added, and the
> good news is the server came back up.
>
> Can anyone suggest what I should do next?
>
> Dennis Williams
>


This message is informational, not really an error message. What it is
saying is that it is not going to add the said entry to the
/etc/name_to_major file because it is already there. No big deal. You
rebooted and everything came back. Were you watching the boot process?
If you didn't see anything remarkable there, I would call it good.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-12-2008, 05:54 AM
BobW
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Patching errors

"0xDEADABE" <none@nowhere.net> wrote in message
news:rsmdnXE5uLXg1uDbnZ2dnUVZ_vPinZ2d@adelphia.com ...
> oracledba.williams@gmail.com wrote:
> > I'm applying patches to a Solaris 8 server using smpatch to bring it
> > up to date.
> >
> > Most of the patches went fine, but a few produced the following error
> > message:
> >
> > add patch 111097-25
> > SUNWcsr: failed to add tomtppm to /etc/name_to_major:
> > (tomtppm) already in use as a driver or alias.
> > SUNWcsr: failed to add m1535ppm to /etc/name_to_major:
> > (m1535ppm) already in use as a driver or alias.
> > SUNWcsr: failed to add ics951601 to /etc/name_to_major:
> > (ics951601) already in use as a driver or alias.
> > SUNWcsr: failed to add adm1031 to /etc/name_to_major:
> > (adm1031) already in use as a driver or alias.
> >
> > My script performed a reboot after all the patches were added, and the
> > good news is the server came back up.
> >
> > Can anyone suggest what I should do next?
> >
> > Dennis Williams
> >

>
> This message is informational, not really an error message. What it is
> saying is that it is not going to add the said entry to the
> /etc/name_to_major file because it is already there. No big deal. You
> rebooted and everything came back. Were you watching the boot process?
> If you didn't see anything remarkable there, I would call it good.


You might also want to check that patch for a README file. It would
probably have some information about any special requirements it might need,
such as applying in single user mode. More than likely, though, the first
reply you got is correct. You're probably good to go.

BobW


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com