Unix Technical Forum

faulty binaries when compiled under 9.0?

This is a discussion on faulty binaries when compiled under 9.0? within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Greetings, Finally made the jump to 9.0 from what I think was Slack 4.0 (it's been a while). Unfortunately, ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Slackware Linux Support

Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2008, 09:46 AM
Terry Caton
 
Posts: n/a
Default faulty binaries when compiled under 9.0?

Greetings,
Finally made the jump to 9.0 from what I think was Slack 4.0 (it's been
a while). Unfortunately, things haven't been running quite as smooth as they
once did. I downloaded the latest stable version of NEdit source, compiled
it, and it runs fine under X. However, when running under X-Win32 5.4 under
Win2k, I get bizarre menu behavior. I also get similar (though not quite the
same) behavior from the stock GEdit binary (again, fine under X). The
precompiled NEdit binary for Linux I downloaded works just fine, though, so
I don't think it's an (entirely) X-Win32 problem. Besides, both applications
worked fine when I was running Slack 4.0. Any ideas where to start? I'm
thinking possibly a faulty library in 9, but I don't know enough to be sure,
just enough to be dangerous. Thanks,

--Terrence


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com