This is a discussion on Takeover time, reverse replication in DataGuard setup? within the Oracle Miscellaneous forums, part of the Oracle Database category; --> There are two servers between which DataGuard is setup. The replication happens from server-1 to server-2. server-1 is currently ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| There are two servers between which DataGuard is setup. The replication happens from server-1 to server-2. server-1 is currently serving and server-2 acts as a standby. I would like to know the following related to this setup: 1) server-2 is in standby mode. Can server-2 start serving immediately in case if server-1 goes out-of-service due to some problems? If not immediate, how much time it will typically take for take-over? 2) Assume server-2 has started serving and hence it is in 'Active' mode. Is it possible to do reverse replication of DB changes from server-2 to server-1(similar to the replication from server-1 to server-2 before takeover happened)? |
| |||
| qazmlp1209@rediffmail.com wrote: > There are two servers between which DataGuard is setup. The replication > happens from server-1 to server-2. server-1 is currently serving and > server-2 acts as a standby. I would like to know the following related > to this setup: > 1) server-2 is in standby mode. Can server-2 start serving immediately > in case if server-1 goes out-of-service due to some problems? If not > immediate, how much time it will typically take for take-over? > > 2) Assume server-2 has started serving and hence it is in 'Active' > mode. Is it possible to do reverse replication of DB changes from > server-2 to server-1(similar to the replication from server-1 to > server-2 before takeover happened)? > 1) You provide us with the answer, as you have tested your scenario. You *did*, now did you not? And no - there is some overhead, for starters, server 2 has to become aware of the fact server 1 died. 2) Yes - and you actually *want* that. Repair server 1 and make it the backup of #2 - in case #2 gets hit by the same problems as #1 did suffer from... Again - you tested that scenario, didn't you (tongue in cheek!) -- Regards, Frank van Bortel |
| |||
| qazmlp1209@rediffmail.com wrote: > There are two servers between which DataGuard is setup. The replication > happens from server-1 to server-2. server-1 is currently serving and > server-2 acts as a standby. I would like to know the following related > to this setup: > 1) server-2 is in standby mode. Can server-2 start serving immediately > in case if server-1 goes out-of-service due to some problems? If not > immediate, how much time it will typically take for take-over? > > 2) Assume server-2 has started serving and hence it is in 'Active' > mode. Is it possible to do reverse replication of DB changes from > server-2 to server-1(similar to the replication from server-1 to > server-2 before takeover happened)? Version of Oracle database? Logical or physical? Have you set up TAF (transparent application failover)? -- Daniel A. Morgan http://www.psoug.org damorgan@x.washington.edu (replace x with u to respond) |
| |||
| qazmlp1209@rediffmail.com wrote: > There are two servers between which DataGuard is setup. The replication > happens from server-1 to server-2. server-1 is currently serving and > server-2 acts as a standby. I would like to know the following related > to this setup: > 1) server-2 is in standby mode. Can server-2 start serving immediately > in case if server-1 goes out-of-service due to some problems? If not > immediate, how much time it will typically take for take-over? No, it is not immediate. How long this opearation will take is dependent on your setup. According to my experiencies it can take few minutes. > > 2) Assume server-2 has started serving and hence it is in 'Active' > mode. Is it possible to do reverse replication of DB changes from > server-2 to server-1(similar to the replication from server-1 to > server-2 before takeover happened)? Everything is in Data Guard documentation. After failover you have to create a new standby database on server-1 from formerly standby now primary database (database on server-2) backup and after synchronization of these two databases you can perform a switchover which will replace primary and standby positions (that means server-1 is primary and server-2 standby again). -- Dusan Bolek |
| ||||
| DA Morgan wrote: > qazmlp1209@rediffmail.com wrote: > > There are two servers between which DataGuard is setup. The replication > > happens from server-1 to server-2. server-1 is currently serving and > > server-2 acts as a standby. I would like to know the following related > > to this setup: > > 1) server-2 is in standby mode. Can server-2 start serving immediately > > in case if server-1 goes out-of-service due to some problems? If not > > immediate, how much time it will typically take for take-over? > > > > 2) Assume server-2 has started serving and hence it is in 'Active' > > mode. Is it possible to do reverse replication of DB changes from > > server-2 to server-1(similar to the replication from server-1 to > > server-2 before takeover happened)? > > Version of Oracle database? Oracle 9i. Is this different in Oracle 10g? > Logical or physical? Physical. > Have you set up TAF (transparent application failover)? No. The servers server-1 and server-2 are located few kilometers apart. Is TAF supposed to be used, for such a setup also? As I am aware, TAF is used mainly among 2 cluster nodes, which are closer & connected by 'Cluster interconnect'. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|