This is a discussion on RE: SERIAL8 on a Fragmented Table within the Informix forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> DOH! I've never done something like that - lol -----Original Message----- From: owner-informix-list@iiug.org [mailto wner-informix-list@iiug.org] On Behalf Of Chris ...
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| DOH! I've never done something like that - lol -----Original Message----- From: owner-informix-list@iiug.org [mailto Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 1:05 PM To: informix-list@iiug.org Subject: Re: SERIAL8 on a Fragmented Table I think I found my problem and it's not really a problem at all. Go figure. During my "testing" I was doing an "SQL> select first 100 * from testtable" and looking at the output of that. It must have just been grabbing data from only one of the fragments. When I add an order by SERIAL column it spits back the serial values incremented by one like I expected. Thanks for any responses. Live and learn I guess. -- Chris sending to informix-list |