This is a discussion on E35 and HP-UX 11i within the HP-UX Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hi all Can anyone tell me if HP-UX 11i will run on an E35 (512MB, RAM, 10GB disk) If ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| |||
| Benjamin Gawert wrote: > Matthew Piechotta wrote: > > >>Can anyone tell me if HP-UX 11i will run on an E35 (512MB, RAM, 10GB >>disk) > > > Yes, perfectly. IMHO a bit faster than 10.20 on the same machine. > > Benjamin We were running 11.0 on G's and I's as testbeds and they ran real good, watch out for the HPPB SESCSI cards though. |
| |||
| In article <4001c6b7_3@127.0.0.1>, Alan D Johnson wrote: > Benjamin Gawert wrote: >> Matthew Piechotta wrote: >>>Can anyone tell me if HP-UX 11i will run on an E35 (512MB, RAM, 10GB >>>disk) >> Yes, perfectly. IMHO a bit faster than 10.20 on the same machine. > We were running 11.0 on G's and I's as testbeds and they ran real good, > watch out for the HPPB SESCSI cards though. Um. What's with the SESCSI then? Is there a problem with those? The same SESCSI+parallel HP-PB card that was shipped still with Kx60s? (well, looks the same anyway) ... or another, older card? And don't tell me that we shouldn't have been using those HP-PB SESCSI/parallel cards on 4-way K460s - that was HP's idea, not ours. Much less odd than the thing about the HP-PB 10BT LAN, too. -- Mikko Nahkola <mnahkola@trein.ntc.nokia.com> #include <disclaimer.h> #Not speaking for my employer. No warranty. YMMV. |
| ||||
| Mikko Nahkola wrote: > In article <4001c6b7_3@127.0.0.1>, Alan D Johnson wrote: > >>Benjamin Gawert wrote: >> >>>Matthew Piechotta wrote: > > >>>>Can anyone tell me if HP-UX 11i will run on an E35 (512MB, RAM, 10GB >>>>disk) >>> >>>Yes, perfectly. IMHO a bit faster than 10.20 on the same machine. > > >>We were running 11.0 on G's and I's as testbeds and they ran real good, >>watch out for the HPPB SESCSI cards though. > > > Um. What's with the SESCSI then? Is there a problem with those? The same > SESCSI+parallel HP-PB card that was shipped still with Kx60s? > (well, looks the same anyway) ... or another, older card? > > And don't tell me that we shouldn't have been using those HP-PB > SESCSI/parallel cards on 4-way K460s - that was HP's idea, not ours. > Much less odd than the thing about the HP-PB 10BT LAN, too. > > We had problems w/ DLT drives off of them, also if you are using 100BT PB cards they are not cooperative. |