This is a discussion on upgrading to kernel 2.6.21.1 problem within the Linux Operating System forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Hi... I compile my kernels and use original (not patched) kernels. Now i'm upgrading a pc from kernel 2.6.18.2 ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi... I compile my kernels and use original (not patched) kernels. Now i'm upgrading a pc from kernel 2.6.18.2 to 2.6.21.1, that is working also as a router. and whatever i do, i can't have this modules: iptable_nat ip_nat_ftp ip_nat_irc ip_conntrack_irc ip_conntrack_ftp so, when i boot with the new kernel i got a lot of errors from the iptables rules... NAT doesn't work, and the only way to have internet is shutting down the firewall, even doing that, there is no internet in clients that use this pc as a router, because nat is not working. do you know if this modules have been removed/replaced? i use guidedog and guarddog to set my firewall/nat, could this progs have became incompatible with this new kernel? i'm using then ncurses interface (the make menuconfig) to set the kernel and i can't find where this settings are anymore, in the netfilter section everything e set to create modules. can you help me? thanks ArameFarpado |
| |||
| ArameFarpado wrote: > Hi... > > I compile my kernels and use original (not patched) kernels. > > Now i'm upgrading a pc from kernel 2.6.18.2 to 2.6.21.1, that is working > also as a router. and whatever i do, i can't have this modules: > > iptable_nat > ip_nat_ftp > ip_nat_irc > ip_conntrack_irc > ip_conntrack_ftp > > > so, when i boot with the new kernel i got a lot of errors from the > iptables rules... NAT doesn't work, and the only way to have internet is > shutting down the firewall, even doing that, there is no internet in > clients that use this pc as a router, because nat is not working. > > do you know if this modules have been removed/replaced? > > i use guidedog and guarddog to set my firewall/nat, could this progs have > became incompatible with this new kernel? > > i'm using then ncurses interface (the make menuconfig) to set the kernel > and i can't find where this settings are anymore, in the netfilter section > everything e set to create modules. > > can you help me? > > thanks > ArameFarpado You should go back into "make menuconfig" and be certain that you allowed the building of all relevent iptables modules. The newer kernel you're trying to use has a few more modules that you need and... be certain you load them at boot time. You can check /var/log/messages for the need modules or look over the error messages that your iptable scripts generate... -- Jerry McBride |
| ||||
| Hi, thanks and sorry for the late reply, i've been running lots of experiments here, as i have time avaiable. Em Segunda, 21 de Maio de 2007 02:17, Jerry McBride escreveu: > > You should go back into "make menuconfig" and be certain that you allowed > the building of all relevent iptables modules. The newer kernel you're > trying to use has a few more modules that you need and... be certain you > load them at boot time. Actualy some modules have been renamed: ip_nat_ftp and ip_nat_irc are now nf_nat_ftp and nf_nat_irc and so the same changes in ip_conntrack_xxx The "network options" in the kernel config is getting more and more complicated, it would be great if the helps in that section would give us the module name that will be created, like the most options in "device drivers". The "network options" section is becaming too complex and it should have better helping texts... that's my opinion. Anyway, i've net, nat and almost everything running now somewow, the system have adapted to the new module naming. i have now a weird situation with one program that worked fine in 2.6.18 and now is not working right, and i have yet to test my firewire interface... other than that, the rest seems fine now. > You can check /var/log/messages for the need modules or look over the > error messages that your iptable scripts generate... Humm... module doesn't exist lots a lots of times Thanks again for your reply ArameFarpado |