This is a discussion on Re: Question on Ldap within the lucky.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> Nicholas Basila dixit: > more roles and I think pam is a better choice for the long run. Having ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Nicholas Basila dixit: > more roles and I think pam is a better choice for the long run. Having Up to the point that you _cannot_ statically link ksh on GNU/Linux because it needs the nsswitch/pam libraries dlopen'd at run time, hah! I think it's best as-is. I can live with the requirement to have pseudo-users in /etc/master.passwd now. Maybe an YP-like kludge would solve that. //mirabile -- > [...] Echtzeit hat weniger mit "Speed"[...] zu tun, sondern damit, da_ der > richtige Proze_ voraussagbar rechtzeitig sein Zeitscheibchen bekommt. Wir haben uns[...] geeinigt, dass das verwendete Echtzeit-Betriebssystem[...] weil selbst einfachste Operationen *echt* *Zeit* brauchen. (aus d.a.s.r) |