Unix Technical Forum

Re: Question on Ldap

This is a discussion on Re: Question on Ldap within the lucky.openbsd.tech forums, part of the OpenBSD category; --> Nicholas Basila dixit: > more roles and I think pam is a better choice for the long run. Having ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > OpenBSD > lucky.openbsd.tech

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-22-2008, 12:15 PM
Thorsten Glaser
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Question on Ldap

Nicholas Basila dixit:

> more roles and I think pam is a better choice for the long run. Having


Up to the point that you _cannot_ statically link ksh on GNU/Linux
because it needs the nsswitch/pam libraries dlopen'd at run time, hah!

I think it's best as-is. I can live with the requirement to have
pseudo-users in /etc/master.passwd now.

Maybe an YP-like kludge would solve that.

//mirabile
--
> [...] Echtzeit hat weniger mit "Speed"[...] zu tun, sondern damit, da_ der
> richtige Proze_ voraussagbar rechtzeitig sein Zeitscheibchen bekommt.

Wir haben uns[...] geeinigt, dass das verwendete Echtzeit-Betriebssystem[...]
weil selbst einfachste Operationen *echt* *Zeit* brauchen. (aus d.a.s.r)

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com