On 23/06/2004, Henning Brauer <lists-openbsdtech@bsws.de> wrote To tech@openbsd.org:
> the manpage example is bad for draining the entire queue.
> the point however is that TAILQ_REMOVE in a TAILQ_FOREACH loop is
> going to bomb out.

No. It *might* bomb out. ;-)

That's the evil part. It's a somewhat race and in the typical "testing"
it wont have to happen - else it would never go into a tree.

Actually, if you look at my latest diff, I've chosen a variant of the
for loop, since in a bit more complex traversal it wont work like
the example in the manpage.
And no, do not always _INIT the thing, too ;-)

After hike there shold be some rewrite of .Sh NOTES - this is more
confusing then helping.

ciao
--
pb@