Unix Technical Forum

Multiple imports

This is a discussion on Multiple imports within the Oracle Database forums, part of the Database Server Software category; --> Hi, Is there any danger to run multiple imports to accelerate an import (with default option: ignore=n ) Thanks ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > Oracle Database

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 08:45 AM
astalavista
 
Posts: n/a
Default Multiple imports

Hi,

Is there any danger to run multiple imports
to accelerate an import (with default option: ignore=n )

Thanks for your lights



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-26-2008, 08:45 AM
joel garry
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Multiple imports

On Oct 23, 12:29 pm, "astalavista" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any danger to run multiple imports
> to accelerate an import (with default option: ignore=n )
>
> Thanks for your lights


No problem, this is "poor-man's parallelization." Except you might
have to use ignore=y, since the first thing is likely to be object
creation.

You need to test, obviously there could be more contention under some
circumstances. And it depends on exactly how you do it, if you simply
start 3 identical imports, two of them might bog everything with the I/
O from constraint violation errors into the error log. On the other
hand, if you are using 3 different exports with the QUERY qualifier to
avoid overlap, through pipes into imp, your bottleneck may very well
be different than a straight imp, and perhaps something you can help
(for example, if you are going over a network it may make sense to
both compress each pipe and temporarily put in a faster private direct
network connection). There also may be freelist contention, or other
oddities having to do with how blocks are loaded that may show up. Or
you just may run into db writer or disk write limitations. The basic
concept is easy enough to test that it is worthwhile to try it. Any
problems may indeed be educational for us all.

Also, some circumstances may favor DIRECT usage. Others may favor
CTAS over a dblink. Others you may want to wind up with the data
contiguous - I believe Tom Kyte may disagree with that, by the way.
Again, only testing your particular situation can you be sure if there
is an effect worth worrying about.

It's nearly always quicker to build the indices and statistics
afterwards, though I've found it is often good enough to do that as
part of the imp, depends what your requirements are - if overnight is
better than babysitting for 3 hours, for example.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/uniont...23tourism.html

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com