Walk-in Interviews for Oracle Apps Consultants

Bootstrap Technologies Private Limited, Global Systems integration and
IT
Services Company with a Focus on Enterprise Applications Space looking
for
Aggressive offshore expansion plans for their Hyderabad Innovation
Center.

Walk-in Interview on 2nd and 3rd Feb (Saturday and Sunday)
2008 between 9.00AM to 2.00 PM.

Positions

Oracle Apps DBA Oracle Apps Technical

Oracle Financials Oracle Manufacturing

Oracle HRMS Oracle DBA/Developers

Educational Qualification
B.E\B.Tech, B.Com, M.Tech, MCA, Msc, MBA, CA, M.Com, ICWAI (First
Class Students Only)

NOTE: BE\B.Tech 2007 Graduates need not attend.

Desired Profile
Age should be less than 35 years

Venue: Bootstrap Technologies (P) Ltd.,
Plot#112#8/3/1100-A-A-1,
Beside CAPRI Towers, Srinagar Colony,
Hyderabad. AP. PH: 040-66667701
Send your updated Resume to base@bootstraptech.com, www.bootstraptech.com

On Jan 31, 12:54*am, baseatbootstrapt...@gmail.com wrote:
> * * * * * * *Walk-in Interviews for Oracle Apps Consultants


> Venue: Bootstrap Technologies (P) Ltd.,
> Plot#112#8/3/1100-A-A-1,
> Beside CAPRI Towers, Srinagar Colony,
> Hyderabad. AP. PH: 040-66667701
> Send your updated Resume to b...@bootstraptech.com,www.bootstraptech.com

At least it's not in the bus station bathroom.

HEY STUPID! This is a worldwide group. I'm not walking from
California to Hyderabad.

Note that you are violating terms of agreement of gmail and the
charter of this group.

Note that you would be violating US employment law were you to be
advertising like this in the US... oh wait, you are! Well, at least
you aren't working for US companies... or are you?

All in all, to say that many of us are less than impressed with your
company is quite an understatment. You just plain look incompetant.

Delete you posts and apologize.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
Since you seem too stupid to understand, that means this is being
posted from an unused email account.

On 31.01.2008 19:00, joel garry wrote:
> Note that you would be violating US employment law were you to be
> advertising like this in the US... oh wait, you are! Well, at least
> you aren't working for US companies... or are you?

Just out of curiosity (I'm not a US citizen): what law is he violating?

Cheers

robert

On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, shortcutter@googlemail.com wrote:
> On 31.01.2008 19:00, joel garry wrote:
>> Note that you would be violating US employment law were you to be
>> advertising like this in the US... oh wait, you are! Well, at least
>> you aren't working for US companies... or are you?
>
> Just out of curiosity (I'm not a US citizen): what law is he
> violating?

Right in the offer:

Desired Profile
Age should be less than 35 years

--
Galen Boyer

On Feb 1, 4:02 am, Galen Boyer <galen_bo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, shortcut...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > On 31.01.2008 19:00, joel garry wrote:
> >> Note that you would be violating US employment law were you to be
> >> advertising like this in the US... oh wait, you are! Well, at least
> >> you aren't working for US companies... or are you?
>
> > Just out of curiosity (I'm not a US citizen): what law is he
> > violating?
>
> Right in the offer:
>
> Desired Profile
> Age should be less than 35 years

Ah, I see. It's the age. Thanks!

robert

On Feb 1, 12:22*am, Robert Klemme <shortcut...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Feb 1, 4:02 am, Galen Boyer <galen_bo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 31 Jan 2008, shortcut...@googlemail.com wrote:
> > > On 31.01.2008 19:00, joel garry wrote:
> > >> Note that you would be violating US employment law were you to be
> > >> advertising like this in the US... oh wait, you are! *Well, at least
> > >> you aren't working for US companies... or are you?
>
> > > Just out of curiosity (I'm not a US citizen): what law is he
> > > violating?
>
> > Right in the offer:
>
> > * Desired Profile
> > * Age should be less than 35 years
>
> Ah, I see. *It's the age. *Thanks!
>
> robert

Yeah, simply advertising sex or age discrimination probably isn't a
problem, but actually doing it and getting caught is big time. There
are exemptions for certain occupations - no one would want to see me
in a topless drive-through coffee bar, I'm sure - but technical Oracle
work sure isn't one of them. India has its own laws and customs, and
is welcome to them. cdos has no laws, but it has customs, and not
posting job ads is one of them.

Violating one countries laws in another country is a whole subject
unto itself (but see foreign section of http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/adea.html
). But abusing workers in one country to benefit corporations in
another country and get around worker protection laws is a moral
issue.

I suspect some Euro laws on the subject are more stringent than the US
law.

jg
--
@home.com is bogus. "What many here object to is being "told" by some
snotty-nosed head hunter they have to demonstrate their "commitment"
to Oracle by taking the OCP, and that their >15 years of using the
product and 27 years in IT count for, exactly, jack." - Noons

On Feb 1, 1:04*pm, joel garry <joel-ga...@home.com> wrote:
> - no one would want to see me in a topless drive-through coffee bar, I'm sure -
>
> jg
> --

Oh, there's likely a group of women somewhere who would want to see
just that. So, Joel, don't count the service industry out if you're
needing extra income. <g>


David Fitzjarrell

On 01.02.2008 20:04, joel garry wrote:
> Yeah, simply advertising sex or age discrimination probably isn't a
> problem, but actually doing it and getting caught is big time. There
> are exemptions for certain occupations - no one would want to see me
> in a topless drive-through coffee bar, I'm sure - but technical Oracle
> work sure isn't one of them.

You mean, they let you administer databases topless? I thought there is
AC everywhere in the US where it gets reasonably hot. :-)

> India has its own laws and customs, and
> is welcome to them. cdos has no laws, but it has customs, and not
> posting job ads is one of them.

Absolutely.

> Violating one countries laws in another country is a whole subject
> unto itself (but see foreign section of http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/adea.html
> ). But abusing workers in one country to benefit corporations in
> another country and get around worker protection laws is a moral
> issue.

Outsourcing is a whole subject in itself. I believe IT companies that
outsource their development to other countries are not doing themselves
a favor. After all this is a core competence and I would not easily
give that away. Let alone all the issues with multi time zone work and
communication.

> I suspect some Euro laws on the subject are more stringent than the US
> law.

Probably, but OTOH it is totally common to ship a picture with your
resume over here in Germany - something I have been told which is
totally unacceptable in the US. But we are on a good way, we have an
anti discrimination law here which might show similar effects over time.

Kind regards

robert

On Feb 1, 1:30*pm, Robert Klemme <shortcut...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 01.02.2008 20:04, joel garry wrote:
>
> > Yeah, simply advertising sex or age discrimination probably isn't a
> > problem, but actually doing it and getting caught is big time. *There
> > are exemptions for certain occupations - no one would want to see me
> > in a topless drive-through coffee bar, I'm sure - but technical Oracle
> > work sure isn't one of them.
>
> You mean, they let you administer databases topless? *I thought there is
> AC everywhere in the US where it gets reasonably hot. *:-)

http://dba-oracle.blogspot.com/2005/...e-becomes.html

But actually I was referring to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...egirls22e.html

>
> > *India has its own laws and customs, and
> > is welcome to them. *cdos has no laws, but it has customs, and not
> > posting job ads is one of them.
>
> Absolutely.
>
> > Violating one countries laws in another country is a whole subject
> > unto itself (but see foreign section ofhttp://www.eeoc.gov/policy/adea.html
> > ). *But abusing workers in one country to benefit corporations in
> > another country and get around worker protection laws is a moral
> > issue.
>
> Outsourcing is a whole subject in itself. *I believe IT companies that
> outsource their development to other countries are not doing themselves
> a favor. *After all this is a core competence and I would not easily
> give that away. *Let alone all the issues with multi time zone work and
> communication.

And don't forget, India lost half it's bandwidth when two cables got
cut in the Mediterranean.

>
> > I suspect some Euro laws on the subject are more stringent than the US
> > law.
>
> Probably, but OTOH it is totally common to ship a picture with your
> resume over here in Germany - something I have been told which is
> totally unacceptable in the US. *But we are on a good way, we have an
> anti discrimination law here which might show similar effects over time.
>

Here, many people are too stupid not to post incriminating pix on
myspace!

jg
--
@home.com is bogus.
I gotta find a good set of Norwegian horns for my jgar the jorrible
persona.

On 01.02.2008 22:58, joel garry wrote:
> On Feb 1, 1:30 pm, Robert Klemme <shortcut...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 01.02.2008 20:04, joel garry wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah, simply advertising sex or age discrimination probably isn't a
>>> problem, but actually doing it and getting caught is big time. There
>>> are exemptions for certain occupations - no one would want to see me
>>> in a topless drive-through coffee bar, I'm sure - but technical Oracle
>>> work sure isn't one of them.
>> You mean, they let you administer databases topless? I thought there is
>> AC everywhere in the US where it gets reasonably hot. :-)
>
> http://dba-oracle.blogspot.com/2005/...e-becomes.html

Uh! *cough*

> But actually I was referring to http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...egirls22e.html

:-)

>>> I suspect some Euro laws on the subject are more stringent than the US
>>> law.
>> Probably, but OTOH it is totally common to ship a picture with your
>> resume over here in Germany - something I have been told which is
>> totally unacceptable in the US. But we are on a good way, we have an
>> anti discrimination law here which might show similar effects over time.
>
> Here, many people are too stupid not to post incriminating pix on
> myspace!

Well... That reminds me of this ebay picture of a TV with incriminating
reflections on the screen... :-)

Cheers

robert