This is a discussion on Re: Huge memory consumption during vacuum (v.8.0) within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes: > I tried run 'vacuumdb -v -z -f wsdb > vacuum-wsdb.log 2>&1&' I'm confused. The ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes: > I tried run 'vacuumdb -v -z -f wsdb > vacuum-wsdb.log 2>&1&' I'm confused. The log trace you showed us before appeared to be from a non-FULL vacuum, but here you're saying it's VACUUM FULL. Which is it ... or did you change? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| |||
| On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes: >> I tried run 'vacuumdb -v -z -f wsdb > vacuum-wsdb.log 2>&1&' > > I'm confused. The log trace you showed us before appeared to be from > a non-FULL vacuum, but here you're saying it's VACUUM FULL. Which is > it ... or did you change? Yes, first time I tried vacuum from withing psql, next time I decided to run vacuumdb and seems changed option. > > regards, tom lane > Regards, Oleg __________________________________________________ ___________ Oleg Bartunov, sci.researcher, hostmaster of AstroNet, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University (Russia) Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(095)939-16-83, +007(095)939-23-83 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| ||||
| Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su> writes: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: >> I'm confused. The log trace you showed us before appeared to be from >> a non-FULL vacuum, but here you're saying it's VACUUM FULL. Which is >> it ... or did you change? > Yes, first time I tried vacuum from withing psql, next time I decided > to run vacuumdb and seems changed option. Um. Well, a VACUUM FULL is going to build in-memory data structures that represent *all* of the usable free space in a table. I don't actually think that VACUUM FULL is useful on an enormous table ... you want to keep after it with routine plain VACUUMs, instead. Another possibility is to use CLUSTER or a rewriting ALTER TABLE to shrink the space, but be aware that this requires a transient second copy of the table and indexes. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|