This is a discussion on Re: 7.2.7 -> 8.0.1 Bundles Ready ... within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org] > Sent: 31 January 2005 22:35 > To: Tom Lane ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| > -----Original Message----- > From: Marc G. Fournier [mailto:scrappy@postgresql.org] > Sent: 31 January 2005 22:35 > To: Tom Lane > Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; David Fetter > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.2.7 -> 8.0.1 Bundles Ready ... > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2005, Tom Lane wrote: > > > "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: > >> /pub/src/v8.0.1 is missing :-( > > > > Why do we even have individual symlinks in pub/src? Seems to me we > > could replace the whole src directory with a symlink to source, and > > eliminate one bit of release bookkeeping ... > > the symlinks wre to make Peter happy ... he didn't like the > 'v' in the > directory name, so we make the src directory that has > 'non-v'd symlinks > > And yes, that is the *only* reason there is a src directory ... Urgh. No offence to Peter, but I think it's a helluva lot messier having all those symlinks. Not to mention the binary/ dir which doesn't have a non-v'ified bin/X.X.X equivalent. Can we lose /src and just keep /source and /binary (personally I don't care whether or not we keep the v's on the subdirs)? It probably causes a lot of bandwidth to be wasted as well - I recently found a mirror site that was mirroring the entire ftp ste using about 20 simultaneous ftp connections. I'll bet that didn't copy the symlinks as symlinks and instead grabbed all the files again, each time it tried to 'sync'. I barred that particular site in the ftpd conf, but there could be others of course. Regards, Dave ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| |||
| So do I get rid of the src directory altogether then, since apparently nobody likes, or wants, it? On Tue, 1 Feb 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Dave Page wrote: >> Urgh. No offence to Peter, but I think it's a helluva lot messier >> having all those symlinks. > > That wasn't my idea. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut > http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org |
| ||||
| Dave Page wrote: > Urgh. No offence to Peter, but I think it's a helluva lot messier > having all those symlinks. That wasn't my idea. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|