This is a discussion on Re: Connect By for 8.0 within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> On Wednesday 02 February 2005 12:56, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > I notice the CONNECT ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On Wednesday 02 February 2005 12:56, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote: > > I notice the CONNECT BY patch has been updated for 8.0: > > > > http://gppl.moonbone.ru/ > > > > Seriously, we really need to get this into 8.1. Convert it to the > > standard WITH RECURSIVE syntax if necessary... > > Yep, we are just waiting for someone to do the work. Actually i believe people want both syntax's as the former is used by oracle and the latter by db2 (iirc) -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |
| ||||
| Robert Treat wrote: > Actually i believe people want both syntax's as the former is used by oracle > and the latter by db2 (iirc) I think the past consensus has been to adopt the SQL standard syntax. Is there any reason to also support the Oracle syntax other than for compatibility? (And if that is it, I think it's a pretty flimsy reason.) -Neil ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) |