This is a discussion on Re: within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>I've tested the performance of 8.0.1 at my dual-boot notebook >>(Linux and Windows XP). >> >>I ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Magnus Hagander wrote: >>I've tested the performance of 8.0.1 at my dual-boot notebook >>(Linux and Windows XP). >> >>I installed 8.0.1 for Linux and Windows XP, and run pgbench >>-c 1 -t 1000 Under Linux (kernel 2.6.10) I got about 800 tps, >>and under Windows XP - about 20-24 tps. >> >>Next I switched off virtual memory under Windows (as it was >>recommended in posting >>http://www.pgsql.ru/db/mw/msg.html?mid=2026070). It does not >>help. Without virtual memory I got 15-17 tps. >> >> >Question 1: Is your writeback cache really disabled in Linux, on the >harddrive? Windows fsync will *write through the disk write cache* if >the driver is properly implemented. AFAIK, on Linux if write cache is >enabled on the drive, fsync will only get into the cache. >800tps sounds unreasonably high on a notebook. > >Question 2: Please try disabling the stats connector and see if that >helps. Merlin Moncure reported some scalability issues with the stats >collector previously. > Also, didn't someone recently report some very significant performance differences Windows networking QoS (Quality of Service) installed? You might try that. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster |