Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32
This is a discussion on Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> K, let me rephrase: currently, upper/lower does not work with 2+ byte unicode characters, on any OS under the ...
| |||||||
![Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32](http://www.unixadmintalk.com/iconimages/pgsql-hackers/re-pgsql-hackers-win32-unicode-utf-8-win32_ltr.gif)
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-11-2008, 03:51 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 K, let me rephrase: currently, upper/lower does not work with 2+ byte unicode characters, on any OS under the C locale. .... John ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match      |
|
04-11-2008, 03:51 AM
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 John Hansen wrote: > currently, upper/lower does not work with 2+ byte unicode characters, > on any OS under the C locale. Sure it does. It's just that the defined behavior of the C locale is often useless in practice. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
 |
« Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] win32 performance - fsync question
|
Finding if old transactions are running... »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:35 AM.
