Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations
This is a discussion on Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> "Mark Cave-Ayland" <m.cave-ayland@webbased.co.uk> writes: > I'm still a little nervous about dropping down to CRC32 from CRC64 and so ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
04-11-2008, 05:10 AM
| ||||
| ||||
 Re: Cost of XLogInsert CRC calculations "Mark Cave-Ayland" <m.cave-ayland@webbased.co.uk> writes: > I'm still a little nervous about dropping down to CRC32 from CRC64 and so > was just wondering what the net saving would be using one CRC64 across the > whole WAL record? None to speak of; the startup/teardown time is trivial. It's the per-byte cost that hurts. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org      |
 |
« Physical Tlist optimization still possible?
|
Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:59 AM.
