This is a discussion on Fixing r-tree semantics within the pgsql Hackers forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:52:03 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Now that the module uses ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:52:03 -0400, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Now that the module uses GIST instead of r-tree, there's no very strong > reason why it should provide these operators at all. I propose removing > all of << >> &< &> from contrib/cube, leaving only the four > n-dimensional indexing operators (&& ~= ~ @). > > Any objections? I seem to remember there being a problem if <, <=, > and >= operators didn't exist and doing some operations (distinct or group by?) that required sorting the data type. I am not sure that you are suggesting that these operators be removed, as you didn't list them in either the remove or keep list above. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq |
| ||||
| Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes: > I seem to remember there being a problem if <, <=, > and >= operators > didn't exist and doing some operations (distinct or group by?) that > required sorting the data type. I am not sure that you are suggesting > that these operators be removed, No, I wasn't. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) |