Unix Technical Forum

PostgreSQL scalability on Sun UltraSparc T1

This is a discussion on PostgreSQL scalability on Sun UltraSparc T1 within the Pgsql Performance forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:43:49AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Jochem van Dieten wrote: > >Tweakers.net ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql Performance

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 09:11 AM
Jim C. Nasby
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PostgreSQL scalability on Sun UltraSparc T1

On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:43:49AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Jochem van Dieten wrote:
> >Tweakers.net has done a database performance test between a Sun T2000 (8
> >core T1) and a Sun X4200 (2 dual core Opteron 280). The database
> >benchmark is developed inhouse and represents the average query pattern
> >from their website. It is MySQL centric because Tweakers.net runs on
> >MySQL, but Arjen van der Meijden has ported it to PostgreSQL and has
> >done basic optimizations like adding indexes.
> >
> >Arjen wrote about some of the preliminary results previously in
> >http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql...6/msg00358.php
> >but the article has now been published http://tweakers.net/reviews/633/7
> >This is all the more impressive if you scroll down and look at the
> >behaviour of MySQL (after tweaking by both MySQL AB and Sun).

>
> I would love to get my hands on that postgresql version and see how much
> farther it could be optimized.


I'd love to get an english translation that we could use for PR.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 09:11 AM
Arjen van der Meijden
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PostgreSQL scalability on Sun UltraSparc T1

On 1-8-2006 19:26, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 08:43:49AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> I'd love to get an english translation that we could use for PR.


Actually, we have an english version of the Socket F follow-up.
http://tweakers.net/reviews/638 which basically displays the same
results for Postgres vs MySQL.
If and when a translation of the other article arrives, I don't know.
Other follow-up stories will follow as well, whether and how soon those
will be translated, I also don't know. We are actually pretty interested
in doing so, but its a lot of work to translate correctly

Best regards,

Arjen

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 09:13 AM
Markus Schaber
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PostgreSQL scalability on Sun UltraSparc T1

Hi, Arjen,

Arjen van der Meijden wrote:

> It was the 8core version with 16GB memory... but actually that's just
> overkill, the active portions of the database easily fits in 8GB and a
> test on another machine with just 2GB didn't even show that much
> improvements when going to 7GB (6x1G, 2x 512M), it was mostly in the
> range of 10% improvement or less.


I'd be interested in the commit_siblings and commit_delay settings,
tuning them could give a high increase on throughput for highly
concurrent insert/update workloads, at the cost of latency (and thus
worse results for low concurrency situations).

Different fsync method settings can also make a difference (I presume
that syncing was enabled).

HTH,
Markus


--
Markus Schaber | Logical Tracking&Tracing International AG
Dipl. Inf. | Software Development GIS

Fight against software patents in EU! www.ffii.org www.nosoftwarepatents.org

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 09:13 AM
Arjen van der Meijden
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: PostgreSQL scalability on Sun UltraSparc T1

Hi Markus,

As said, our environment really was a read-mostly one. So we didn't do
much inserts/updates and thus spent no time tuning those values and left
them as default settings.

Best regards,

Arjen

Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi, Arjen,
>
> Arjen van der Meijden wrote:
>
>> It was the 8core version with 16GB memory... but actually that's just
>> overkill, the active portions of the database easily fits in 8GB and a
>> test on another machine with just 2GB didn't even show that much
>> improvements when going to 7GB (6x1G, 2x 512M), it was mostly in the
>> range of 10% improvement or less.

>
> I'd be interested in the commit_siblings and commit_delay settings,
> tuning them could give a high increase on throughput for highly
> concurrent insert/update workloads, at the cost of latency (and thus
> worse results for low concurrency situations).
>
> Different fsync method settings can also make a difference (I presume
> that syncing was enabled).
>
> HTH,
> Markus
>
>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com