This is a discussion on Question: Clustering & Load Balancing within the Pgsql Performance forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Hi, has anyone here had any good/bad experiences clustering & load balancing a PostgreSQL server on Redhat (ES)? i ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Hi, has anyone here had any good/bad experiences clustering & load balancing a PostgreSQL server on Redhat (ES)? i have two identical servers with plenty of memory plus a nice disc array. the solution should have both redundancy and performance. BTW: it's a back end to a web based application in a high traffic situation. i thought it might be sensible to use a redhat cluster rather than introduce another ingredient like PGCluster given we 'can' use a RH cluster. any suggestions invited and appreciated. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings |
| ||||
| CARMODA napsal(a): > has anyone here had any good/bad experiences clustering & load balancing > a PostgreSQL server on Redhat (ES)? We have recently successfully rolled-out a solution consisting of two PostgreSQL database backends replicated by Slony. The backends are accessed from a bunch of application servers (Apache) via pgpool. We have some shell scripts around it to handle monitoring, failover and switch-over. It is built on CentOS4 (ie. RedHat ES4). It's pretty solid. -- Michal Táborský chief systems architect Internet Mall, a.s. <http://www.MALL.cz> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate |