GFS2, OFCS2, lustre, CXFS, GPFS, Veritas and what else there is..

...has someone experience with any of those? Is it bearable to run PG on
them from a performance point of view? I guess not, but any positive
reports?

Thanks

--
Regards,
Hannes Dorbath

Hi,

On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 15:15 +0100, Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> GFS2, OFCS2, lustre, CXFS, GPFS, Veritas and what else there is..
>
> ..has someone experience with any of those? Is it bearable to run PG
> on them from a performance point of view? I guess not, but any
> positive reports?

I have tested it on GFS (v1) and lustre. On Lustre, I saw a bit
performance problem, but I think we could bear it thinking the
advantages of Lustre.

OTOH, RHEL AS + RHEL Cluster Suite + LVM + GFS combination worked very
well, as compared to extX. I don't have benchmarks handy, BTW.

Regards,
--
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBFo6Papme12CBXnxERAmYwAJ49JgNzi0whNzNku6Pzpc Wr+tao4ACeK80X
kyiW3pFKT+AkFu7JVjGVs90=
=0Wl2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----