Unix Technical Forum

Re: Potential memory usage issue

This is a discussion on Re: Potential memory usage issue within the Pgsql Performance forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> writes: > In response to David Brain <dbrain@bandwidth.com>: >> I am curious as to why 'top' ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql Performance

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:24 AM
Tom Lane
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Potential memory usage issue

Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> writes:
> In response to David Brain <dbrain@bandwidth.com>:
>> I am curious as to why 'top' gives such different output on the two
>> systems - the datasets are large and so I know I benefit from having
>> high shared_buffers and effective_cache_size settings.


> Have you done any actual queries on the new system? PG won't use the
> shm until it needs it -- and that doesn't occur until it gets a request
> for data via a query.


More accurately, top won't consider shared mem to be part of the process
address space until it's actually touched by that process.

regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com