This is a discussion on Re: Potential memory usage issue within the Pgsql Performance forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> writes: > In response to David Brain <dbrain@bandwidth.com>: >> I am curious as to why 'top' ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> writes: > In response to David Brain <dbrain@bandwidth.com>: >> I am curious as to why 'top' gives such different output on the two >> systems - the datasets are large and so I know I benefit from having >> high shared_buffers and effective_cache_size settings. > Have you done any actual queries on the new system? PG won't use the > shm until it needs it -- and that doesn't occur until it gets a request > for data via a query. More accurately, top won't consider shared mem to be part of the process address space until it's actually touched by that process. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match |