Unix Technical Forum

How much ram is too much

This is a discussion on How much ram is too much within the Pgsql Performance forums, part of the PostgreSQL category; --> Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other systems in the server bottleneck ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Database Server Software > PostgreSQL > Pgsql Performance

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
Dave Cramer
 
Posts: n/a
Default How much ram is too much

Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other
systems in the server bottleneck ?

Dave

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
Guy Rouillier
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How much ram is too much

Dave Cramer wrote:
> Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other
> systems in the server bottleneck ?


What CPU and OS are you considering?

--
Guy Rouillier

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at

http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
Ben
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How much ram is too much

What is your expected data size and usage pattern? What are the other
components in the system?

On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Dave Cramer wrote:

> Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other systems in
> the server bottleneck ?
>
> Dave
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
Dave Cramer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How much ram is too much

It's an IBM x3850 using linux redhat 4.0


On 8-Jun-07, at 12:46 PM, Guy Rouillier wrote:

> Dave Cramer wrote:
>> Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other
>> systems in the server bottleneck ?

>
> What CPU and OS are you considering?
>
> --
> Guy Rouillier
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
david@lang.hm
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How much ram is too much

> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other systems
>> in the server bottleneck ?


the only way 128G of ram would be too much is if your total database size
(including indexes) is smaller then this.

now it may not gain you as much of an advantage going from 64G to 128G as
it does going from 32G to 64G, but that depends on many variables as
others have been asking.

David Lang

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
Zoltan Boszormenyi
 
Posts: n/a
Default [OT] Re: How much ram is too much

Dave Cramer írta:
> It's an IBM x3850 using linux redhat 4.0


Isn't that a bit old? I have a RedHat 4.2 somewhere
that was bundled with Applixware 3. :-)

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
Joshua D. Drake
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: How much ram is too much

david@lang.hm wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Dave Cramer wrote:
>>
>>> Is it possible that providing 128G of ram is too much ? Will other
>>> systems
>>> in the server bottleneck ?

>
> the only way 128G of ram would be too much is if your total database
> size (including indexes) is smaller then this.
>
> now it may not gain you as much of an advantage going from 64G to 128G
> as it does going from 32G to 64G, but that depends on many variables as
> others have been asking.


I don't know about the IBM but I know some of the HPs require slower ram
to actually get to 128G.

Joshua D. Drake


>
> David Lang
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>



--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

http://archives.postgresql.org

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
Joshua D. Drake
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Re: How much ram is too much

Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> Dave Cramer írta:
>> It's an IBM x3850 using linux redhat 4.0

>
> Isn't that a bit old? I have a RedHat 4.2 somewhere
> that was bundled with Applixware 3. :-)


He means redhat ES/AS 4 I assume.

J


>



--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
Dave Cramer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Re: How much ram is too much


On 8-Jun-07, at 2:10 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>> Dave Cramer írta:
>>> It's an IBM x3850 using linux redhat 4.0

>> Isn't that a bit old? I have a RedHat 4.2 somewhere
>> that was bundled with Applixware 3. :-)

>
> He means redhat ES/AS 4 I assume.
>

Yes AS4
> J
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
> Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
> Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
> http://www.commandprompt.com/
>
> Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/
> donate
> PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
>
>



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-19-2008, 10:58 AM
Zoltan Boszormenyi
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: [OT] Re: How much ram is too much

Joshua D. Drake írta:
> Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>> Dave Cramer írta:
>>> It's an IBM x3850 using linux redhat 4.0

>>
>> Isn't that a bit old? I have a RedHat 4.2 somewhere
>> that was bundled with Applixware 3. :-)

>
> He means redhat ES/AS 4 I assume.
>
> J


I guessed that, hence the smiley.
But it's very unfortunate that version numbers
are reused - it can cause confusion.
There was a RH 4.0 already a long ago,
when the commercial and the community
version were the same. I think Microsoft
will avoid reusing its versions when year 2095 comes. :-)

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com