Unix Technical Forum

SCO drop loyal resellers...

This is a discussion on SCO drop loyal resellers... within the Sco Unix forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> In article <v0agpvck1hjbr60o9k93isl56kvm7q6k96@4ax.com>, FyRE <FyRE@toktik.demon.ku.oc.x> wrote: >On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:08:36 +0000 (UTC), tony@aplawrence.com wrote: > >>FyRE <FyRE@toktik.demon.ku.oc.x> ...


Go Back   Unix Technical Forum > Unix Operating Systems > Sco Unix

FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
  #161 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2008, 11:59 AM
Bill Vermillion
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: sco-list: Re: SCO drop loyal resellers...

In article <v0agpvck1hjbr60o9k93isl56kvm7q6k96@4ax.com>,
FyRE <FyRE@toktik.demon.ku.oc.x> wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:08:36 +0000 (UTC), tony@aplawrence.com wrote:
>
>>FyRE <FyRE@toktik.demon.ku.oc.x> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:40:27 +0000 (UTC), tony@aplawrence.com wrote:

>>
>>>>FyRE <FyRE@toktik.demon.ku.oc.x> wrote:

>>
>>>The warnings are given, the authors have the final say in what they
>>>wish to write. If you want to stay with the older versions of the
>>>tools you can grab the source code or binaries and carry on using them
>>>for as long as you like. You can even modify the code yourself;
>>>imagine that! As I said, nobody forces you to use the latest tools.


>>I don't give a rat's ass if the warnings are on cereal boxes: it's
>>still STUPID.


>Yes, I think the word stupid applies here all right. Let's suppose you
>drive a car, Tony; now one day a new model of your current car
>appears, all shiny and new as it spins in the showroom window.
>Unfortunately this new car runs on hydrogen gas, which isn't available
>in your neighbourhood. It also has the controls on the opposite side,
>and it's not available in the colour you'd like. Now, if you were
>stupid you'd wander on into the dealer's lair and drop your cash, then
>spend the next 5 years complaining about your purchase. A smart man
>would stick with what he has, or use something else.


>In short, nobody is FORCING you to jump into that car, Tony...


The problem with the changes to the OS is that you don't know about
them untl AFTER the fact. It's like buying the car and finding so
many things change that you can't handle them - and the dealer
has an 'all sales final' policy.

And as to things being different it reminded me of an incident a
long time ago. A dealer had me try out a new Motoguzzi [and
Italian motorcycle]. I drove off, pressed my foot down to change
gears and came to a quick halt. The brake and transmission were on
opposite sides of almost everyother bike made.

It's one thing to know what surprises may be in store - but it's
disconcerting to find them after the fact.



--
Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #162 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2008, 11:59 AM
tony@aplawrence.com
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: sco-list: Re: SCO drop loyal resellers...

FyRE <FyRE@toktik.demon.ku.oc.x> wrote:
>On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:08:36 +0000 (UTC), tony@aplawrence.com wrote:


>>FyRE <FyRE@toktik.demon.ku.oc.x> wrote:
>>>On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 10:40:27 +0000 (UTC), tony@aplawrence.com wrote:

>>
>>>>FyRE <FyRE@toktik.demon.ku.oc.x> wrote:

>>
>>>The warnings are given, the authors have the final say in what they
>>>wish to write. If you want to stay with the older versions of the
>>>tools you can grab the source code or binaries and carry on using them
>>>for as long as you like. You can even modify the code yourself;
>>>imagine that! As I said, nobody forces you to use the latest tools.

>>
>>I don't give a rat's ass if the warnings are on cereal boxes: it's
>>still STUPID.


>Yes, I think the word stupid applies here all right. Let's suppose you
>drive a car, Tony; now one day a new model of your current car
>appears, all shiny and new as it spins in the showroom window.
>Unfortunately this new car runs on hydrogen gas, which isn't available
>in your neighbourhood. It also has the controls on the opposite side,
>and it's not available in the colour you'd like. Now, if you were
>stupid you'd wander on into the dealer's lair and drop your cash, then
>spend the next 5 years complaining about your purchase. A smart man
>would stick with what he has, or use something else.


>In short, nobody is FORCING you to jump into that car, Tony...


Well, you are wrong, boopy, because what I do for a living is work
on people's cars when they don't run right.

I don't control what they buy, but when I jump into it to start it up, it
annoys me when the gas pedal has been moved again.


--
tony@aplawrence.com Unix/Linux/Mac OS X resources: http://aplawrence.com
Get paid for writing about tech: http://aplawrence.com/publish.html
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #163 (permalink)  
Old 02-15-2008, 12:00 PM
Jeff Liebermann
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: "Pros, Priests and Zealots: The Three Faces of Linux"

On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 20:11:48 +0100, FyRE <FyRE@toktik.demon.ku.oc.x>
wrote:

>On 23 Oct 2003 08:19:55 -0700, jlselsewhere@my-deja.com (J. L.
>Schilling) wrote:
>
>>"Jim Sullivan" <seattlecurler@comcast.net> wrote in message news:<j46dnS3VF-Ni9AqiRVn-vA@comcast.com>...
>>> I actually think that this article resonates after reading this thread!
>>>
>>> Pros, Priests and Zealots: The Three Faces of Linux
>>> http://www.technewsworld.com/perl/story/31899.html

>>
>>Yes, it does. It's easy to identify all three types in posts to
>>this newsgroup ;-)

>
>I can't believe anyone would stoop so low as to identify with an
>Enderle article. Any search on his "opinions" will quickly show the
>idiot as the whoring schill he is. In fact, please do read the article
>linked above; it's rare you get the chance to read such wrongheaded
>nonsense plastered up on a supposed news site (well, aside from Darl's
>ludicrous daily statements - I'm still expecting Darl to turn up to
>the next press conference in a tin-foil hat).


Once upon a time, I worked for a compulsive liar. 99% of everything
that he said was a lie, gross distortion, embellishment,
misinterpretation, fabrication, or combination of these. It wasn't
terribly difficult for me to recognize the lies and distortions as I
was able to reason for myself. He continued to lie, while I continued
to get the work done. I found the remaining 1% was well worth the
effort of listening. These were gems of importance and enlightenment
which over the years have had a profound effect on the way I looked at
the world of business. At the bottom of every dumpster is a gem.
Whether these are worth excavating is up to the individual.

Since then, I've worked for and with others that had differing
opinions, minority political views, divergent viewpoints,
non-traditional philosophies, and strange problem solving
methodologies. I never pass judgement on the individual and have
successfully worked with people I would not spend 1 millisecond with
outside of work. You wanna reconsider your unsubstantiated summary
judgement of the author and redirect your criticism to his opinions.


--
Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
(831)421-6491 pgr (831)336-2558 home
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
jeffl@comix.santa-cruz.ca.us jeffl@cruzio.com
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
www.UnixAdminTalk.com