This is a discussion on Samba AND VisionFS - On same Server? within the Sco Unix forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> Office Server: SCO OSR 5.0.6. I'm runing Samba v3. Home Client: win XP. Is it possible to run BOTH ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| Office Server: SCO OSR 5.0.6. I'm runing Samba v3. Home Client: win XP. Is it possible to run BOTH Samba and VisionFS on the Server? Samba to map file sharing and VisionFS to do the printer share? Thanks, --Ray Petkus |
| |||
| On Thu, Dec 06, 2007, RWP wrote: >Office Server: SCO OSR 5.0.6. I'm runing Samba v3. >Home Client: win XP. >Is it possible to run BOTH Samba and VisionFS on the Server? Samba to >map file sharing and VisionFS to do the printer share? My SWAG is that you can't, unless perhaps you run them bound to different IP addresses, as the M$ SMB protocols use the same ports (137-139 and perhaps others depending on what M$ is doing today). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 If the future navigation system [for interactive networked services on the NII] looks like something from Microsoft, it will never work. (Chairman of Walt Disney Television & Telecommunications) |
| |||
| RWP wrote (on Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:04:31PM +0000): > Office Server: SCO OSR 5.0.6. I'm runing Samba v3. > Home Client: win XP. > Is it possible to run BOTH Samba and VisionFS on the Server? Samba to > map file sharing and VisionFS to do the printer share? > Thanks, > --Ray Petkus Nope. Unless you tell Samba to use a different port, which means you'll have to tell Windows to use a different port, which is difficult to impossible, I should think. But, why maintain two packages? Why not have Samba do everything? -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM awacs@ziskind.us Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants |
| |||
| I previously ran VisionFS file and printer sharing without problems. Now, Some of my home client logins run VISTA. I've installed Samba and have no problems with file shares, but I have been unable to achieve UNIX printer sharing on my clients. Here is the output of "testparm:" [global] server string = Samba Server interfaces = net0, lo0 bind interfaces only = Yes password server = log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 printcap name = lpstat dns proxy = No printing = sysv print command = lp -c -d%p %s; rm %s lpq command = lpstat -o%p lprm command = cancel %p-%j lppause command = lp -i %p-%j -H hold lpresume command = lp -i %p-%j -H resume queuepause command = disable %p queueresume command = enable %p [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /usr/spool/samba guest ok = Yes printable = Yes browseable = No [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = No guest ok = Yes [windata] comment = Quicken Data path = /usr2/bakwin read only = No guest ok = Yes See any problems here? --Ray Petkus On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:29:18 -0500, Nachman Yaakov Ziskind <awacs@ziskind.us> wrote: >RWP wrote (on Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 05:04:31PM +0000): >> Office Server: SCO OSR 5.0.6. I'm runing Samba v3. >> Home Client: win XP. >> Is it possible to run BOTH Samba and VisionFS on the Server? Samba to >> map file sharing and VisionFS to do the printer share? >> Thanks, >> --Ray Petkus > >Nope. Unless you tell Samba to use a different port, which means you'll >have to tell Windows to use a different port, which is difficult to >impossible, I should think. > >But, why maintain two packages? Why not have Samba do everything? |
| |||
| On Thu, Dec 06, 2007, RWP wrote: >I previously ran VisionFS file and printer sharing without problems. >Now, Some of my home client logins run VISTA. I've installed Samba and >have no problems with file shares, but I have been unable to achieve >UNIX printer sharing on my clients. >Here is the output of "testparm:" > >[global] > server string = Samba Server > interfaces = net0, lo0 > bind interfaces only = Yes > password server = > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 50 > printcap name = lpstat > dns proxy = No > printing = sysv > print command = lp -c -d%p %s; rm %s I think you may be running into timing problems with this one in that the rm may be nuking the file before lp is done with it. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@celestial.com Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 The children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society that is coming, where everyone would be interdependent. 1899 John Dewey, educational philosopher, proponent of modern public schools. |
| |||
| RWP wrote (on Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:50:22PM +0000): > I previously ran VisionFS file and printer sharing without problems. > Now, Some of my home client logins run VISTA. I've installed Samba and > have no problems with file shares, but I have been unable to achieve > UNIX printer sharing on my clients. > Here is the output of "testparm:" > > See any problems here? > > --Ray Petkus the usual nostrum in such situations is to turn the debugging up high (Samba support variable levels of debug; the highest levels eat up megabytes, it seems) and/or run tcpdump. -- _________________________________________ Nachman Yaakov Ziskind, FSPA, LLM awacs@ziskind.us Attorney and Counselor-at-Law http://ziskind.us Economic Group Pension Services http://egps.com Actuaries and Employee Benefit Consultants |
| ||||
| Nachman Yaakov Ziskind typed (on Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:37:28PM -0500): | RWP wrote (on Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:50:22PM +0000): | > I previously ran VisionFS file and printer sharing without problems. | > Now, Some of my home client logins run VISTA. I've installed Samba and | > have no problems with file shares, but I have been unable to achieve | > UNIX printer sharing on my clients. | > Here is the output of "testparm:" | > | > See any problems here? | | the usual nostrum in such situations is to turn the debugging up | high (Samba support variable levels of debug; the highest levels | eat up megabytes, it seems) and/or run tcpdump. There is not yet a set of Samba binaries for OSR 5 or OSR 6 to work with Vista. -- JP |