Dans l'article <V9Cdnf_iYNNIez6iRVn-ig@speakeasy.net>, *@*.* a écrit :
>
> The "pgp trash troll delete" posts meet the requirements for
> being cancelable EMP/spam. Feel free to cancel them at will.
>
> Here is how to cancel the "pgp trash troll delete" posts:
>
And why in the why world would you cancel any post ?

Just a question of balance.

Most of these posts are utter nonsense, right, they are what they are made for.
Irritate you (9). And some are quite nice in this way.

Though, some remarks sometimes, barely I must admit in the last months,
are just pure logic, which is rare enough to be selected

Would you miss the next savior just because you don't like
much the color (colour ?/pick ur local) of the pants he's
laundering face up to you ?

Well, maybe, a taste od 'societe du spectacle' hit you for good then ?

Oh, damnit.. Better off bed.

And never pretend I didn't say so, that's ..
Er..
G'nite Wundah

blundally as corways

(9) You: not only you but me too, and them, and them too

Alan Connor writes:

> On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 23:47:00 +0100, Mxsmanic <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Alan Connor writes:
> >
> >> Quite true. But nothing as complex as PGPsig/keys are necessary to do that
> >> on the Usenet.
> >
>
> Wrong.

You realize that you are arguing with your own backquote, don't you?

> Sure get bored with the lies told by PGPsig/key fanatics.

Is that why you resort to quarreling with yourself?

--
Transpose hotmail and mxsmanic in my e-mail address to reach me directly.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> No, the group didn't come down on anyone. Perhaps the pgp trash
> trolls did though.

Not here. Ok so it was probably traceable through headers and would have
been shown to be a spoof eventually, but probably not until after
considerable hassle. PGP makes spotting spoof posts a lot easier.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.hn.org/drno/pgp.shtml

iQA/AwUBP6vta7HlcSptAz1hEQJlHQCgzF5fOoXLTV+fcXWL/iEX+GkJ3FsAnA1J
2QKyIt6RahwPvW85PEjdZRh0
=jipU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> > All headers can be forged. Digitally-signed text cannot.
>
> Wrong.
>
Well put it this way. I'm not one of them, but I've met people who could,
and have, forged a header. Wheras I have yet to meet anyone who has forged
a digitally signed message.
Your script idea would work...most of the time. But I disagree that it's
simpler. What could be simpler than checking an option in my news program
and it says at the top of every message I read whether it has been validly
signed or not? And would you be able to implement your script under
windows, which is like it or not the most common OS? And given that there
is a PGP system in place, running on about 20OSes, and well-tested by the
community, why not just use that?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 6.5.8ckt http://www.hn.org/drno/pgp.shtml

iQA/AwUBP6vu07HlcSptAz1hEQJe2ACfQy9Tb6C2CVwwNe/RKnOvjZSTELQAnRva
+9Hp1V/HTqxPWoHu0hDlrQXM
=4jgG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----