This is a discussion on Setting time in Slackware within the Slackware Linux Support forums, part of the Unix Operating Systems category; --> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joost Kremers <joostkremers@yahoo.com> is thought to have typed the following text on 2003-12-15: ...
| |||||||
| FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| ||||
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Joost Kremers <joostkremers@yahoo.com> is thought to have typed the following text on 2003-12-15: > Bartosz Oudekerk wrote: > > my father bought a sansui when he was in his early twenties. that system > lasted for about 20 years. he bought another sansui set then, but it didn't > have the same quality. it certainly didn't last as long... > I seem to get that with a lot of "modern" equipment, while technology is supposed to get better, things break sooner. This is especially true of harddrives IME, the bigger they get the shorter they last. On Sansui: It is being imported by the same company that imports Akai equipment (which also used to be very good, long ago), so chances are they simply bought the name when Sansui filed for bankrucy, and started to use it only now. - -- Bartosz Oudekerk Play Rogue, visit exotic locations, meet strange creatures and kill them. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/3jct256ZyNYAOpkRAuOkAJ0XNXn1bJNczXwjJd1WzzpJKnkbdA CdFSsn p7av/Ct7Wd3Uag5PnoEpP7I= =YA2a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| |||
| Bartosz Oudekerk <bartosz@see_my_gnupg-key.com> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 pgp trash troll delete > On Sansui: It is being imported by the same company that imports > Akai equipment (which also used to be very good, long ago), so > chances are they simply bought the name when Sansui filed for > bankrucy, and started to use it only now. What on earth does this have to do with slackware? Please refrain from using pgp unless it is necessary. Show some respect for the other posters. How many times do you have to be told? cordially, as always, rm |
| |||
| |
| |||
| On 15 Dec 2003 22:34:23 GMT Bartosz Oudekerk <bartosz@see_my_GnuPG-key.com> wrote: > I seem to get that with a lot of "modern" equipment, while technology > is supposed to get better, things break sooner. This is especially > true of harddrives IME, the bigger they get the shorter they last. > It is not so much because they are bigger, but because they are being made more cheaply. I have been to a couple of talks given by scientists working for hard drive manufacturers. Some years ago they were designing hard drives to last for 5 years. But recently, they have relaxed that requirement to 2 or 3 years. What is the reason? Consumers want lower prices. It's sad that people tend to be so short sighted. Mike |
| ||||
| I noticed that no one seemed to have found 'www.ntp.org'. (Or if it's been posted, excuse me for not noticing.) On 15 Dec 2003 21:14:31 GMT, William Park <opengeometry@yahoo.ca> wrote: >Getting back on issue, though... I think using Stratum 1 servers, say, >once a day or two should be okey. Here are Stratum 2 NTP servers that First, their opinion on using Stratum 1 servers: "Rules of Engagement As the load on the hosts supporting NTP primary (stratum 1) time service is heavy and always increasing, clients should avoid using the primary servers whenever possible." So it sounds like, "Hands off those Stratum 1's!" Besides, they list something like 174 Stratum 2 Servers. Plenty to go 'round. Second, you can get a list of Stratum 2 from their site, however they don't like people linking to the list, so I'll refrain from posting it here. This is what they said: "Note that the lists are updated frequently, so please do not cache them and please do not reveal links to the lists themselves. Note that the names of the lists are changed on a regular basis in order to discourage direct links." So, instead, just go to their site and find the link 'public NTP server list.', which brings up a choice between the Stratum 1 or 2 Server list. HTH, David |