Jurgen Philippaerts <jurgen@see.my.pgp.key> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

pgp trash troll delete

> but anyway, he's onto something, he should start plonking more
> people. everybody even. it would make this newsgroup soo nice for
> him, no more annoying posts for him.

We shouldn't have to alter our behaviour to accommodate pgp trash
trolls. Your use of pgp is unwarranted in this post. So why don't
you just show the other posters some respect and restrict your use
of pgp to circumstances that warrant it?

cordially, as always,

rm

Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

pgp trash troll delete

> On 2003-12-19, Fred Emmott <pcfreak65@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > oops just realised i didn't sign lsat one - its from me

> That's wonderful, but signing your posts isn't terribly helpful
> if your public key isn't available.

Of course it isn't terribly helpful to sign your posts even if your
public key is available, unless of course, trolling is now
considered helpful.

BTW: Could you please show some respect for other posters by
restricting your use of pgp to appropriate circumstances?

cordially, as always,

rm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 19:15:40 -0800, Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> On 2003-12-19, Fred Emmott <pcfreak65@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> oops just realised i didn't sign lsat one - its from me
>
> That's wonderful, but signing your posts isn't terribly helpful if your
> public key isn't available.

I got it... maybe you need to switch key servers? :-)

keyserver x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu

I'd copy and paste the whole big import speel, but it is all gone now.
:-\

--
Rob | If not safe,
Email and Jabber: | one can never be free.
athlonrob at axpr dot net |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4qyshm6KEoOOAe0RAscaAJ96SUHmp/fkneTj4v/Ev/DbHpsuEgCeMs7F
75hE21kjDlXlhUg+wFOkTQs=
=Ehuk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Fred Emmott <pcfreak65@hotmail.com> says...
>
>dcba@dcba.dcba.org wrote:
>>
>> And for the same reason that not all web pages begin with https://
>> in their address, pgp is inappropriate to this ng.
>
>Thats got to be a first "for the same reason" from you that nearly made
>sense...

But the analogy breaks down. If it's OK for one person to use
http and another to use https, why isn't it OK for for one
person to sign posts with PGP and another to not do so?

I do wish that you would stop feeding the troll. Pretty please?
Pretty please with sugar on top?

--
Guy Macon, Electronics Engineer & Project Manager for hire.
Remember Doc Brown from the _Back to the Future_ movies? Do you
have an "impossible" engineering project that only someone like
Doc Brown can solve? My resume is at http://www.guymacon.com/

-----BEGIN PIG SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHB0

Jurgen Philippaerts <jurgen@see.my.pgp.key> says...
>
>> > > Completely ignore the ones who complain about pgp and don't reply
>> > > to them or worry about it.
>
>> > And we'll completely ignore _you._
>> > Plonk!
>> > cordially, as always,
>> > rm
>
>hold on here for a minute...
>did trollboy just plonk someone ?

Oooh! Oooh! Plonk *me*, trollboy, Plonk *meeeee*!!!!!

Pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease?? ????

-----BEGIN PIG SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPIG v0.0.01 (Commodore 128)

42

-----END PIG SIGNATURE-----

Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com> wrote:
> Fred Emmott <pcfreak65@hotmail.com> says...
> >dcba@dcba.dcba.org wrote:

> >> And for the same reason that not all web pages begin with
> >> https:// in their address, pgp is inappropriate to this ng.

> >Thats got to be a first "for the same reason" from you that
> >nearly made sense...

> But the analogy breaks down.

No, it doesn't.

> If it's OK for one person to use http and another to use https,
> why isn't it OK for for one person to sign posts with PGP and
> another to not do so?

It's ok to make secure websites where the content of the website
demands security. But if it doesn't warrant ssl, then ssl
shouldn't be used.

It's the same thing with pgp.

> I do wish that you would stop feeding the troll. Pretty please?
> Pretty please with sugar on top?

Where on earth does a moron like you get off on calling me a troll?
And where do you get off telling other people who to respond to?

Bugger off.

cordially, as always,

rm

AthlonRob <junkmail@axpr.net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message

pgp trash troll delete

> Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote:
> > Fred Emmott <pcfreak65@hotmail.com> wrote:

> >> oops just realised i didn't sign lsat one - its from me

> > That's wonderful, but signing your posts isn't terribly helpful
> > if your public key isn't available.

Signing your posts isn't terribly helpful even if your key is
available. Could you please refrain from using pgp in situations
where it is not warranted?

Thank you.

cordially, as always,

rm

Guy Macon <http://www.guymacon.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PIG SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHB0

pgp trash troll delete

> Oooh! Oooh! Plonk *me*, trollboy, Plonk *meeeee*!!!!!

> Pleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleasepleaseplease?? ????

Nope. We would appreciate it, however, if you stopped using pgp in
frivolous postings like this one. It's a violation of this ng's
policy and it is inconsiderate to other posters.

Have a clue.

cordially, as always,

rm

Guy Macon says...

>-----BEGIN PIG SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHB0

(snip)

>-----BEGIN PIG SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPIG v0.0.01 (Commodore 128)
>
>42
>
>-----END PIG SIGNATURE-----

How much do you want to bet that trollboy complains that I used
PGP to sign the above post when I clearly did not? <grin>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 12:58:44AM PST, wrote
in article <kJudnWydocdSVn-iRVn-uw@speakeasy.net>:

> How much do you want to bet that trollboy complains that I used
> PGP to sign the above post when I clearly did not? <grin>

we already know that he has no clue about what he's talking about, he
prooved that himself quite alot of times already. why bother to
remove him from the killfile and find out


Jurgen.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4tMp1ucXIiwNwbURAn+HAJ9Epw0CfaLpMt6tgI0vOthNJ7duPA CfYjaY
mhDsZEeD7DQMzupjVxNVWh0=
=2wEN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----